Finance AI Index
Index Accounting and close AI accounting assistants › Ramp vs Numeric
AI accounting assistants · September 2026 Edition

Ramp vs Numeric

Zero of twelve models named Ramp first on the direct prompt; one named Numeric. Ramp was named by nine of the twelve models and Numeric by nine and Ramp carries 15 labels and Numeric 17, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Ramp

accepted challenger

Named in seventeen categories this edition.

Numeric

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share9%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#6A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels1517A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Ramp reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Sage Intacct was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Sage Intacct vs Ramp · Sage Intacct vs Numeric · Zoho Books vs Ramp

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the AI accounting assistants page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
RampFirst choices, of twelve modelsNumeric
Direct01
Paraphrase42
Comparative00
Budget-constrained00
Scale-constrained00
Negative001 against Ramp
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Ramp and Numeric stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Ramp Numeric first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Ramp on the left and Numeric on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Ramp and Numeric stood in it.

Numeric first, Ramp an alternative

1 of 12 modelsRamp was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashLedge, Numeric alternatives: Ramp, Tabs, Vic.ai

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Perplexity SonarSage Intacct alternatives: DualEntry, Numeric, Vic.ai
Kimi K2Sage Intacct alternatives: DualEntry, Numeric, Vic.ai

Neither was named

9 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Vic.ai alternatives: Booke AI, DualEntry, Integra Balance AI, Sage Intacct
GPT-5.4 miniSage Intacct alternatives: FloQast, Hyperbots A/P Suite, Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, Oracle NetSuite
Grok 4.1 FastSage Intacct alternatives: Docyt, Oracle NetSuite, QuickBooks Online, Xero
Mistral SmallSage Intacct alternatives: Truewind, Vic.ai
DeepSeek V4 FlashRho, Sage Intacct alternatives: Oracle NetSuite, Vic.ai, Zeni
Llama 4 MaverickSage Intacct alternatives: Truewind, Vic.ai
Qwen 3.7 FlashDualEntry alternatives: Sage Intacct, Vic.ai
GLM 4.7 FlashXSage Intacct alternatives: Docyt, Zeni
MiniMax M2.5Sage Intacct alternatives: DualEntry, Truewind, Vic.ai

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Ramp0%#– of 11
Numeric0%#– of 11
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Ramp leads by two points.
Ramp9%#3 of 14
Numeric7%#6 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Numeric leads at enterprise.
Numeric7%#6 of 8
Ramp2%#– of 8
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Ramp

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“Researchers found a prompt-injection vulnerability where hidden instructions inside a spreadsheet could trick the AI into exfiltrating sensitive financial data” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“I would recommend starting with Ramp Intelligence if you need broad spend management capabilities, or Ledge if your primary focus is month-end close automation” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Ramp is the safest recommendation because it covers the broadest operational accounting surface area while still being explicitly positioned for mid-market teams” Perplexity Sonar · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Numeric

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Best For: Mid-market finance teams looking to dramatically compress close times.... It is built for audit scrutiny.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.