Every category where a model named Docyt for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI accounting assistants	Accounting and close	2%	11 of 79	0%	11	accepted challenger
Account reconciliation	Accounting and close	0%	67 of 72	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Docyt yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Docyt across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	1	4
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels1

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative27 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I recommend starting with Vic.ai for accounts payable and Docyt for end‑to‑end bookkeeping.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI accounting assistants · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Accounting firm managing many clients → Dext + Karbon or Docyt.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI accounting assistants · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Multi-location businesses (e.g., hospitality/franchises)” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI accounting assistants · comparative prompt · alternative

“3. Docyt (Best for End-to-End Bookkeeping)” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI accounting assistants · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Integration failures with banks/ERPs, slow syncs, implementation surprises” Grok 4.1 Fast · Account reconciliation · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Docyt, over the 27 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Docyt was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Vic.ai17 of 271Not in the top three

QuickBooks Online16 of 275Not in the top three

Xero13 of 275Not in the top three

BILL10 of 270Not in the top three

Zeni10 of 270Not in the top three

Ramp8 of 272Not in the top three

Numeric8 of 270Not in the top three

Sage Intacct7 of 274Not in the top three

FloQast7 of 271Not in the top three

Digits6 of 271Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Docyt. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 27 answers that named Docyt and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

intuit.com16

dualentry.com14

aibuzz.blog10

articsledge.com10

gotofu.com10

numeric.io10

aimultiple.com9

bestaiaccounting.com8

fast.io8

layer3labs.io8

103 of the 103 domain citations in answers naming Docyt came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

intuit.com/blog/innovative-thinking/best-ai-accounting-software-tools16

dualentry.com/blog/best-ai-accounting-software14

gotofu.com/blog/best-ai-bookkeeping-software10

aibuzz.blog/best-ai-accounting-software9

aimultiple.com/accounting-ai-agent9

fast.io/resources/best-ai-agents-accounting-finance-20268

articsledge.com/post/ai-accounting-tools7

fathomhq.com/blog/best-ai-accounting-tools-what-to-use-and-why7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Docyt

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Docyt; a claim can dispute any of them.

Docyt (GARY) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Docyt's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Docyt, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at docyt.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.