Finance AI Index
Index › Accounting and close › Financial close manageme › FloQast vs Numeric
Financial close management · September 2026 Edition

FloQast vs Numeric

Nine of twelve models named FloQast first on the direct prompt; zero named Numeric. FloQast was named by twelve of the twelve models and Numeric by eleven and FloQast carries 54 labels and Numeric 42, so the shares are not directly comparable.

FloQast

endorsed leader

Named in ten categories this edition.

Numeric

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share60%19%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate11%2%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels5442A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, FloQast reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Trintech Adra was named alongside these two in twelve of the twelve direct answers. FloQast vs Prophix · Numeric vs Prophix

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the financial close management page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FloQastFirst choices, of twelve modelsNumeric
Direct90
Paraphrase101
Comparative22
Budget-constrained174 against FloQast · 1 against Numeric
Scale-constrained50
Negative322 against FloQast
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where FloQast and Numeric stood in it.

FloQast first, Numeric an alternative

9 of 12 modelsNumeric was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashFloQast alternatives: Numeric, Planful, Trintech Adra
Perplexity SonarFloQast alternatives: Prophix, Trintech Adra
Grok 4.1 FastFloQast alternatives: Numeric, Prophix, Trintech Adra
Mistral SmallFloQast alternatives: HighRadius, Trintech Adra
DeepSeek V4 FlashFloQast alternatives: Numeric, Trintech Adra
Qwen 3.7 FlashFloQast alternatives: BlackLine, Prophix, Trintech Adra
Kimi K2FloQast alternatives: Numeric, Trintech Adra
GLM 4.7 FlashXFloQast, Prophix alternatives: Numeric, Planful, Trintech Adra, Workiva
MiniMax M2.5FloQast alternatives: Numeric, Trintech Adra, Workiva

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Prophix alternatives: FloQast, HighRadius, Trintech Adra
Llama 4 MaverickTrintech Adra alternatives: DOKKA Close, FloQast

Neither was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniBlackLine alternatives: Trintech Adra, Workiva

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Numeric leads by eighteen points.
Numeric36%#1 of 9
FloQast18%#2 of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: FloQast leads at mid-market.
FloQast60%#1 of 9
Numeric19%#2 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
FloQast leads by four points.
FloQast9%#3 of 9
Numeric4%#5 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about FloQast

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“Avoid FloQast/BlackLine unless your close process is highly complex” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid BlackLine, FloQast, and Trintech” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“While popular, users report several concerns: Pricing is not transparent and described as "steep relative to what the platform delivers"” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“The strongest mid-market fits where you'll likely land your shortlist: FloQast (accounting-led, broad ERP support, strong SOX controls)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Numeric

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“More flexible pricing, starting around $30/user/month, but still an investment.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Numeric stands out as the best financial close management software option for a company with a limited budget” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“Numeric - Best for mid-sized to enterprise teams needing transaction-level visibility and AI-driven close.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
FloQast vs ProphixNumeric vs ProphixThe full financial close manageme standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.