Finance AI Index
Index › Accounting and close › Financial close manageme › Numeric vs Prophix
Financial close management · September 2026 Edition

Numeric vs Prophix

Zero of twelve models named Numeric first on the direct prompt; two named Prophix. Numeric was named by eleven of the twelve models and Prophix by seven and Numeric carries 42 labels and Prophix 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Numeric

accepted challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Prophix

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share19%5%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate2%9%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels4211A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Numeric reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Trintech Adra was named alongside these two in twelve of the twelve direct answers. FloQast vs Numeric · FloQast vs Prophix

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the financial close management page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
NumericFirst choices, of twelve modelsProphix
Direct02
Paraphrase10
Comparative20
Budget-constrained701 against Numeric · 1 against Prophix
Scale-constrained00
Negative20
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Numeric and Prophix stood in it.

Prophix first, Numeric an alternative

2 of 12 modelsNumeric was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Prophix alternatives: FloQast, HighRadius, Trintech Adra
GLM 4.7 FlashXFloQast, Prophix alternatives: Numeric, Planful, Trintech Adra, Workiva

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashFloQast alternatives: Numeric, Planful, Trintech Adra
Perplexity SonarFloQast alternatives: Prophix, Trintech Adra
Grok 4.1 FastFloQast alternatives: Numeric, Prophix, Trintech Adra
DeepSeek V4 FlashFloQast alternatives: Numeric, Trintech Adra
Qwen 3.7 FlashFloQast alternatives: BlackLine, Prophix, Trintech Adra
Kimi K2FloQast alternatives: Numeric, Trintech Adra
MiniMax M2.5FloQast alternatives: Numeric, Trintech Adra, Workiva

Neither was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniBlackLine alternatives: Trintech Adra, Workiva
Mistral SmallFloQast alternatives: HighRadius, Trintech Adra
Llama 4 MaverickTrintech Adra alternatives: DOKKA Close, FloQast

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Numeric leads by thirty-six points.
Numeric36%#1 of 9
Prophix0%#– of 9
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Numeric leads by fourteen points.
Numeric19%#2 of 9
Prophix5%#3 of 9
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Numeric leads by four points.
Numeric4%#5 of 9
Prophix0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Numeric

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“More flexible pricing, starting around $30/user/month, but still an investment.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Numeric stands out as the best financial close management software option for a company with a limited budget” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“Numeric - Best for mid-sized to enterprise teams needing transaction-level visibility and AI-driven close.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Prophix

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. One of one in this category shown.

“Most dedicated financial close software (e.g., FloQast, BlackLine, Cube, Prophix) uses custom pricing” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · soft negative
Also compared
FloQast vs NumericFloQast vs ProphixThe full financial close manageme standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.