Visual Lease vs EZLease
Two of twelve models named Visual Lease first on the direct prompt; zero named EZLease. Visual Lease was named by twelve of the twelve models and EZLease by ten and Visual Lease carries 41 labels and EZLease 29, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the lease accounting page.
By framing
Visual LeaseFirst choices, of twelve modelsEZLease
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Visual Lease and EZLease were named in the same answer thirty-two times, of the 105 answers naming Visual Lease and the 67 naming EZLease. In those answers EZLease took the first choice seven times and Visual Lease one.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | ||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | |||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | | |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | | |
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |
Visual Lease EZLease first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Visual Lease on the left and EZLease on the right.The direct prompt
Visual Lease first, EZLease not the choice
2 of 12 modelsEZLease was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
9 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
EZLease25%#1 of 9Visual Lease0%#9 of 9Visual Lease10%#3 of 12EZLease10%#4 of 12Visual Lease15%#2 of 10EZLease2%#– of 10What the models said about Visual Lease
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Visual Lease: Steep learning curve, reporting that "doesn't always bend the way you want," slow performance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“users frequently report that the reporting tool is rigid and less customizable than desired” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“often require hefty annual contracts and implementation fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Visual Lease and iLeasePro are the top recommendations due to their strong compliance features, mid-market focus” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Choose Visual Lease if you are a large enterprise needing heavy analytics and complex workflows.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with FinQuery or Visual Lease. Both are leaders in the mid-market space” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about EZLease
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Avoid for Dual Standards: iLeasePro or EZLease—... lack robust IFRS 16/multi-currency support.” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“The best lease accounting software for a company with a limited budget is EZLease.” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“choose EZLease for the best budget-friendly dedicated lease accounting software” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“For a mid-sized B2B company, I recommend starting with EZLease.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.