Every category where a model named EZLease for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Lease accounting	Accounting and close	10%	4 of 60	3%	29	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EZLease yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EZLease across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	1	0	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	3	1	1	5
Mistral Small	0	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	0	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	1	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Kimi K2	0	3	0	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	1	0	4
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct15 labels3

Paraphrase8 labels4

Comparative17 labels6not counted in share

Budget-constrained17 labels10

Scale-constrained6 labels1

Negative4 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative67 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 26 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best lease accounting software for a company with a limited budget is EZLease.” Llama 4 Maverick · Lease accounting · budget prompt · first choice

“choose EZLease for the best budget-friendly dedicated lease accounting software” Perplexity Sonar · Lease accounting · budget prompt · first choice

“For a mid-sized B2B company, I recommend starting with EZLease.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Lease accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“EZLease appears to be the most tailored option.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Lease accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid for Dual Standards: iLeasePro or EZLease—... lack robust IFRS 16/multi-currency support.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Lease accounting · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EZLease, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EZLease was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

FinQuery37 of 6716Not in the top three

Visual Lease32 of 671Not in the top three

iLeasePro28 of 677Not in the top three

Trullion24 of 671Not in the top three

Crunchafi18 of 671Not in the top three

Nakisa Lease Administration14 of 673Not in the top three

MRI ProLease14 of 670Not in the top three

Xero14 of 670Not in the top three

NetLease12 of 670Not in the top three

Spacebase11 of 672Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EZLease. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 65 of the 67 answers that named EZLease and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

softwareconnect.com57

debtbook.com41

capterra.com40

acquisition-international.com37

getapp.com36

blackowlsystems.com34

gartner.com34

g2.com29

netgain.tech27

occupier.com27

362 of the 362 domain citations in answers naming EZLease came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-lease-accounting-software54

debtbook.com/blog/best-lease-accounting-software40

acquisition-international.com/best-lease-accounting-software-of-2026-from-compliance-to-ca37

softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-lease-management-software35

gartner.com/reviews/market/lease-accounting-and-management-software34

blackowlsystems.com/best-lease-accounting-software-in-2026-compared33

occupier.com/blog/best-lease-accounting-software26

netgain.tech/blog/best-lease-accounting-software25

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as EZLease

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as EZLease; a claim can dispute any of them.

EZLease (by insightsoftware) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EZLease's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EZLease, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ezlease.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.