Cake Equity vs Fidelity Private Shares
Zero of twelve models named Cake Equity first on the direct prompt; zero named Fidelity Private Shares. Cake Equity was named by eleven of the twelve models and Fidelity Private Shares by nine and Cake Equity carries 38 labels and Fidelity Private Shares 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the cap table management page.
By framing
Cake EquityFirst choices, of twelve modelsFidelity Private Shares
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Cake Equity and Fidelity Private Shares were named in the same answer nineteen times, of the 94 answers naming Cake Equity and the 27 naming Fidelity Private Shares. In those answers Fidelity Private Shares took the first choice one time and Cake Equity one.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | ||
| Mistral Small | | | | | ||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | |||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | ||||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Cake Equity Fidelity Private Shares first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Cake Equity on the left and Fidelity Private Shares on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
9 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Cake Equity20%#2 of 6Fidelity Private Shares0%#– of 6Cake Equity7%#5 of 8Fidelity Private Shares2%#8 of 8Cake Equity0%#9 of 9Fidelity Private Shares0%#– of 9What the models said about Cake Equity
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Qapita (for its global, audit‑ready, mid‑market focus) and Cake Equity (for intuitive UX and transparent pricing) are both strong starting points” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“The best cap table management software for a company with a limited budget is Cake Equity, which offers a free starting point” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“the best cap table management software is usually Cake Equity if you want a free starter tier” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
What the models said about Fidelity Private Shares
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“starting with a free tier (Carta Launch or Fidelity Private Shares)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Offers secure equity management with strong support and investor access for small and mid-market companies.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Fidelity Private Shares (Free for <25 stakeholders and <$1M raised): Bank-backed reliability” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.