Finance AI Index
Index Equity and corporate Cap table management › Qapita vs Fidelity Private Shares
Cap table management · September 2026 Edition

Qapita vs Fidelity Private Shares

Four of twelve models named Qapita first on the direct prompt; zero named Fidelity Private Shares. Qapita was named by eleven of the twelve models and Fidelity Private Shares by nine and Qapita carries 26 labels and Fidelity Private Shares 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Qapita

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Fidelity Private Shares

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share14%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#8A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels2614A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Qapita reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Carta was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Carta vs Qapita · Carta vs Fidelity Private Shares · Qapita vs Eqvista

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the cap table management page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
QapitaFirst choices, of twelve modelsFidelity Private Shares
Direct40
Paraphrase301 against Qapita
Comparative00
Budget-constrained01
Scale-constrained10
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Qapita and Fidelity Private Shares were named in the same answer six times, of the 67 answers naming Qapita and the 27 naming Fidelity Private Shares. In those answers Fidelity Private Shares took the first choice zero times and Qapita one.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Qapita and Fidelity Private Shares stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Qapita Fidelity Private Shares first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Qapita on the left and Fidelity Private Shares on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Qapita and Fidelity Private Shares stood in it.

Qapita first, Fidelity Private Shares not the choice

4 of 12 modelsFidelity Private Shares was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Mistral SmallCarta, Qapita
DeepSeek V4 FlashCarta, Qapita alternatives: Ledgy
Llama 4 MaverickCarta, Pulley, Qapita
GLM 4.7 FlashXQapita alternatives: Cake Equity, Capshare, Mantle, Pulley

Neither was the first choice, one was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Carta alternatives: Cake Equity, Pulley, Qapita
Gemini 3.5 FlashCarta alternatives: ClosingWell, Ledgy, Pulley, Qapita
Perplexity SonarCarta alternatives: Qapita
Qwen 3.7 FlashCarta alternatives: Pulley, Qapita

Neither was named

4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniCarta alternatives: Eqvista, Ledgy, Shareworks
Grok 4.1 FastCarta alternatives: Ledgy, Pulley
Kimi K2Carta alternatives: Cake Equity, Eqvista, Ledgy, Pulley
MiniMax M2.5Carta, Shareworks alternatives: EquityZen, Ledgy

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Qapita leads by five points.
Qapita5%#5 of 6
Fidelity Private Shares0%#– of 6
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Qapita leads by twelve points.
Qapita14%#2 of 8
Fidelity Private Shares2%#8 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Qapita leads by nine points.
Qapita9%#3 of 9
Fidelity Private Shares0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Qapita

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Strong in Asia-Pacific, but not a leader in the US/EU.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Qapita and Carta are the most frequently recommended due to their scalability, global compliance features” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Qapita offers the best balance of full-lifecycle features and transparent pricing for mid-market scale” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Carta and Qapita are the top recommendations based on scalability, feature set, and industry adoption” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Fidelity Private Shares

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“starting with a free tier (Carta Launch or Fidelity Private Shares)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Offers secure equity management with strong support and investor access for small and mid-market companies.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Fidelity Private Shares (Free for <25 stakeholders and <$1M raised): Bank-backed reliability” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.