Ledgy vs Fidelity Private Shares
Zero of twelve models named Ledgy first on the direct prompt; zero named Fidelity Private Shares. Ledgy was named by twelve of the twelve models and Fidelity Private Shares by nine and Ledgy carries 36 labels and Fidelity Private Shares 14, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the cap table management page.
By framing
LedgyFirst choices, of twelve modelsFidelity Private Shares
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Ledgy and Fidelity Private Shares were named in the same answer fourteen times, of the 104 answers naming Ledgy and the 27 naming Fidelity Private Shares. In those answers Fidelity Private Shares took the first choice zero times and Ledgy zero.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | |||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | |||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | ||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
Ledgy Fidelity Private Shares first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Ledgy on the left and Fidelity Private Shares on the right.The direct prompt
Neither was the first choice, one was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Ledgy0%#6 of 6Fidelity Private Shares0%#– of 6Ledgy3%#6 of 8Fidelity Private Shares2%#8 of 8Ledgy0%#8 of 9Fidelity Private Shares0%#– of 9What the models said about Ledgy
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Avoid for tight budgets: ... Ledgy (€900/year+)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“many reviews note that its scenario modeling lacks depth for complex liquidation preferences” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd suggest Carta if you're in the US or Ledgy if you're international/European” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Shortlist 3 (e.g., Carta, Pulley, Ledgy) based on your geography/ESOP needs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“If your company is headquartered in Europe, the UK, or APAC, these platforms are highly competitive” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
What the models said about Fidelity Private Shares
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“starting with a free tier (Carta Launch or Fidelity Private Shares)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
“Offers secure equity management with strong support and investor access for small and mid-market companies.” Llama 4 Maverick · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Fidelity Private Shares (Free for <25 stakeholders and <$1M raised): Bank-backed reliability” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.