Qapita vs Ledgy
Four of twelve models named Qapita first on the direct prompt; zero named Ledgy. Qapita was named by eleven of the twelve models and Ledgy by twelve and Qapita carries 26 labels and Ledgy 36, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the cap table management page.
By framing
QapitaFirst choices, of twelve modelsLedgy
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Qapita and Ledgy were named in the same answer thirty-seven times, of the 67 answers naming Qapita and the 104 naming Ledgy. In those answers Ledgy took the first choice one time and Qapita five.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | | | ||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | |||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | |
Qapita Ledgy first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Qapita on the left and Ledgy on the right.The direct prompt
Qapita first, Ledgy an alternative
4 of 12 modelsLedgy was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
What the models said about Qapita
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“Strong in Asia-Pacific, but not a leader in the US/EU.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Qapita and Carta are the most frequently recommended due to their scalability, global compliance features” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Qapita offers the best balance of full-lifecycle features and transparent pricing for mid-market scale” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Carta and Qapita are the top recommendations based on scalability, feature set, and industry adoption” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Ledgy
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“Avoid for tight budgets: ... Ledgy (€900/year+)” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“many reviews note that its scenario modeling lacks depth for complex liquidation preferences” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“I'd suggest Carta if you're in the US or Ledgy if you're international/European” MiniMax M2.5 · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Shortlist 3 (e.g., Carta, Pulley, Ledgy) based on your geography/ESOP needs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“If your company is headquartered in Europe, the UK, or APAC, these platforms are highly competitive” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.