Finance AI Index
Index Equity and corporate Cap table management › Pulley vs Shareworks
Cap table management · September 2026 Edition

Pulley vs Shareworks

One of twelve models named Pulley first on the direct prompt; one named Shareworks. Pulley was named by twelve of the twelve models and Shareworks by ten and Pulley carries 56 labels and Shareworks 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Pulley

criticized challenger

Named in three categories this edition.

Shareworks

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share8%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate30%27%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#4#7A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels5626A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Pulley reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Carta was named alongside these two in eleven of the twelve direct answers. Carta vs Pulley · Carta vs Shareworks · Qapita vs Pulley

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the cap table management page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
PulleyFirst choices, of twelve modelsShareworks
Direct112 against Pulley
Paraphrase101 against Pulley · 2 against Shareworks
Comparative303 against Pulley
Budget-constrained203 against Pulley · 1 against Shareworks
Scale-constrained111 against Pulley · 1 against Shareworks
Negative107 against Pulley · 3 against Shareworks
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Pulley and Shareworks were named in the same answer sixty-seven times, of the 168 answers naming Pulley and the 89 naming Shareworks. In those answers Shareworks took the first choice seven times and Pulley eleven.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Pulley and Shareworks stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Pulley Shareworks first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Pulley on the left and Shareworks on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Pulley and Shareworks stood in it.

Pulley first, Shareworks not the choice

1 of 12 modelsShareworks was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Llama 4 MaverickCarta, Pulley, Qapita

Shareworks first, Pulley not the choice

1 of 12 modelsPulley was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
MiniMax M2.5Carta, Shareworks alternatives: EquityZen, Ledgy

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Carta alternatives: Cake Equity, Pulley, Qapita
GPT-5.4 miniCarta alternatives: Eqvista, Ledgy, Shareworks
Gemini 3.5 FlashCarta alternatives: ClosingWell, Ledgy, Pulley, Qapita
Grok 4.1 FastCarta alternatives: Ledgy, Pulley
Qwen 3.7 FlashCarta alternatives: Pulley, Qapita
Kimi K2Carta alternatives: Cake Equity, Eqvista, Ledgy, Pulley
GLM 4.7 FlashXQapita alternatives: Cake Equity, Capshare, Mantle, Pulley

Neither was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Perplexity SonarCarta alternatives: Qapita
Mistral SmallCarta, Qapita
DeepSeek V4 FlashCarta, Qapita alternatives: Ledgy

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Pulley leads by thirty points.
Pulley30%#1 of 6
Shareworks0%#– of 6
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Pulley leads by five points.
Pulley8%#4 of 8
Shareworks3%#7 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Shareworks leads at enterprise.
Shareworks20%#2 of 9
Pulley5%#5 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Pulley

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“When to avoid: Immediately if considering now—migrate risks data loss or disruption... obsolete.” Grok 4.1 Fast · negative prompt · hard negative
“you should avoid Pulley and look at the following highly rated, cost-effective alternatives” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“A notable alternative, but Pulley is now shutting down (announced September 2026)” MiniMax M2.5 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Stick with well-reviewed, scalable platforms like Pulley, AngelList Equity, or Cake Equity for early-stage companies.” Mistral Small · negative prompt · first choice
“### 1. The Modern Disruptor: Pulley ... *Long-term Private/Hypergrowth?* Go with Pulley (best efficiency/UX).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Pulley = best modeling and affordability for early founders, but less institutional weight.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice

What the models said about Shareworks

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“treat any enterprise-level platform (Shareworks, Morgan Stanley) as a contract trap for early-stage companies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“and Shareworks, which are overkill and overpriced for a budget-conscious company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“### 3. The One to Skip (with a caveat): Shareworks by Morgan Stanley” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Carta or Shareworks are typically the most balanced choices” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Strong for your profile, but quote-only pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“The gold standard if your company is actively planning an IPO within the next 12 to 24 months... generally considered heavy and slow” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.