Finance AI Index
Index Equity and corporate Cap table management › Carta vs Shareworks
Cap table management · September 2026 Edition

Carta vs Shareworks

Eleven of twelve models named Carta first on the direct prompt; one named Shareworks. Carta was named by twelve of the twelve models and Shareworks by ten and Carta carries 65 labels and Shareworks 26, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Carta

endorsed leader

Named in three categories this edition.

Shareworks

criticized challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share44%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate22%27%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#7A position in a field of 8; printed, not drawn.
Labels6526A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Carta reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Qapita was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. Carta vs Qapita · Carta vs Eqvista · Carta vs Pulley

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the cap table management page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
CartaFirst choices, of twelve modelsShareworks
Direct1111 against Carta
Paraphrase602 against Shareworks
Comparative120
Budget-constrained403 against Carta · 1 against Shareworks
Scale-constrained511 against Shareworks
Negative0010 against Carta · 3 against Shareworks
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Carta and Shareworks were named in the same answer eighty-five times, of the 230 answers naming Carta and the 89 naming Shareworks. In those answers Shareworks took the first choice nine times and Carta thirty-eight.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Carta and Shareworks stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Carta Shareworks first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Carta on the left and Shareworks on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Carta and Shareworks stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 12 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
MiniMax M2.5Carta, Shareworks alternatives: EquityZen, Ledgy

Carta first, Shareworks an alternative

10 of 12 modelsShareworks was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Carta alternatives: Cake Equity, Pulley, Qapita
GPT-5.4 miniCarta alternatives: Eqvista, Ledgy, Shareworks
Gemini 3.5 FlashCarta alternatives: ClosingWell, Ledgy, Pulley, Qapita
Perplexity SonarCarta alternatives: Qapita
Grok 4.1 FastCarta alternatives: Ledgy, Pulley
Mistral SmallCarta, Qapita
DeepSeek V4 FlashCarta, Qapita alternatives: Ledgy
Llama 4 MaverickCarta, Pulley, Qapita
Qwen 3.7 FlashCarta alternatives: Pulley, Qapita
Kimi K2Carta alternatives: Cake Equity, Eqvista, Ledgy, Pulley

Neither was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GLM 4.7 FlashXQapita alternatives: Cake Equity, Capshare, Mantle, Pulley

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Carta leads by sixteen points.
Carta16%#4 of 6
Shareworks0%#– of 6
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Carta leads by forty-one points.
Carta44%#1 of 8
Shareworks3%#7 of 8
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Carta leads by fourteen points.
Carta34%#1 of 9
Shareworks20%#2 of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Carta

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Skip enterprise tools like Carta's paid plans (Build/Grow can run $3,000–$12,000/year” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Several industry voices explicitly recommend *not* working with Carta.” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Carta for core trust reasons” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Carta (Scale/Enterprise Tier): The institutional default... highly capable for late-stage secondary transactions, but it is also the most expensive and has faced scrutiny over aggressive pricing hikes.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“The industry standard... the platform that virtually every institutional investor, auditor, and law firm recognizes as the *authoritative* equity record.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“Institutional trust & full compliance depth | Carta... you'll likely end up there for credibility and compliance depth despite the cost” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Shareworks

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“treat any enterprise-level platform (Shareworks, Morgan Stanley) as a contract trap for early-stage companies” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“and Shareworks, which are overkill and overpriced for a budget-conscious company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“### 3. The One to Skip (with a caveat): Shareworks by Morgan Stanley” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Carta or Shareworks are typically the most balanced choices” MiniMax M2.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Strong for your profile, but quote-only pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“The gold standard if your company is actively planning an IPO within the next 12 to 24 months... generally considered heavy and slow” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.