Every category where a model named Qapita for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cap table management	Equity and corporate	14%	2 of 41	4%	26	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Qapita yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Qapita across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	1	0	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	0	2
Mistral Small	2	0	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	1	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	0	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	2	1	0	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labels5

Paraphrase17 labels6

Comparative13 labelsNone

Budget-constrained10 labels3

Scale-constrained11 labels1

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative67 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Qapita and Carta are the most frequently recommended due to their scalability, global compliance features” Mistral Small · Cap table management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Qapita offers the best balance of full-lifecycle features and transparent pricing for mid-market scale” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cap table management · direct prompt · first choice

“Carta and Qapita are the top recommendations based on scalability, feature set, and industry adoption” Mistral Small · Cap table management · direct prompt · first choice

“I'd start with Qapita (or Cake Equity if you prefer a lower‑cost, founder‑friendly option)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cap table management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Strong in Asia-Pacific, but not a leader in the US/EU.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cap table management · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Qapita, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Qapita was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Carta60 of 6721Compare →

Pulley46 of 678Not in the top three

Ledgy37 of 671Not in the top three

Shareworks33 of 674Not in the top three

Cake Equity28 of 675Not in the top three

Eqvista24 of 671Compare →

Astrella12 of 672Not in the top three

Mantle9 of 674Not in the top three

J.P. Morgan Workplace Solutions6 of 673Not in the top three

Fidelity Private Shares6 of 670Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Qapita. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 65 of the 67 answers that named Qapita and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

qapita.comYour site57

cakeequity.com51

guideflow.com46

valueaddvc.com36

waveup.com31

eqvista.com30

learn.g2.com29

ctacquisitions.com27

carta.com23

worldmetrics.org23

296 of the 353 domain citations in answers naming Qapita came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/cap-table-management-software39

cakeequity.com/guides/best-cap-table-software38

qapita.com/blog/best-cap-table-management-software38

valueaddvc.com/blog/best-cap-table-management-tools-in-2026-carta-pulley-angellist-capdesk31

waveup.com/blog/best-cap-table-management-software31

learn.g2.com/best-equity-management-software29

ctacquisitions.com/best-cap-table-software-202627

aifundingtracker.com/best-cap-table-management-software21

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Qapita's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Qapita, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at qapita.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.