ContractZen vs Diligent
One of twelve models named ContractZen first on the direct prompt; zero named Diligent. ContractZen was named by nine of the twelve models and Diligent by eight and ContractZen carries 12 labels and Diligent 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the entity management page.
By framing
ContractZenFirst choices, of twelve modelsDiligent
Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, ContractZen and Diligent were named in the same answer seven times, of the 28 answers naming ContractZen and the 74 naming Diligent. In those answers Diligent took the first choice zero times and ContractZen three.
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | ||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | |||||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
ContractZen Diligent first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, ContractZen on the left and Diligent on the right.The direct prompt
ContractZen first, Diligent not the choice
1 of 12 modelsDiligent was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was named
11 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
ContractZen16%#2 of 12Diligent0%#12 of 12ContractZen13%#4 of 12Diligent3%#8 of 12Diligent9%#– of 8ContractZen—not namedWhat the models said about ContractZen
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“I'd recommend ContractZen as the top corporate governance and entity management tool” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I recommend ContractZen as a strong corporate governance and entity management tool” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“ContractZen is the best overall choice for most mid-market B2B companies.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Diligent
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Legacy Systems (e.g., Diligent, CSC Entity Management): Often highly robust ... but can feel clunky, require heavy training, have longer implementation times, and carry higher price tags.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Many legacy systems (like Diligent, Mitratech, or CSC) are designed for large multinationals, hide their pricing ... often start at tens of thousands of dollars per year.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“## Top Recommendation: Diligent” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.