Every category where a model named ContractZen for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Entity management	Equity and corporate	13%	4 of 87	0%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ContractZen yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ContractZen across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	2	0	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase18 labels10

Comparative1 label1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 label1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend ContractZen as the top corporate governance and entity management tool” Grok 4.1 Fast · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I recommend ContractZen as a strong corporate governance and entity management tool” Mistral Small · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“ContractZen is the best overall choice for most mid-market B2B companies.” Mistral Small · Entity management · direct prompt · first choice

“Top Recommendation: ContractZen (Best overall for mid-sized B2B)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Entity management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ContractZen, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ContractZen was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

EntityKeeper16 of 286Not in the top three

Athennian15 of 282Not in the top three

CSC Entity Management9 of 280Not in the top three

Diligent Entities8 of 280Not in the top three

Diligent7 of 280Not in the top three

Filejet6 of 281Not in the top three

MinuteBox5 of 283Not in the top three

Lextree5 of 282Not in the top three

Carta3 of 280Not in the top three

Commenda3 of 280Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ContractZen. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 28 answers that named ContractZen and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com14

g2.com11

anywherer.com9

coverpin.com9

f6s.com9

getapp.com9

gitnux.org9

sourceforge.net9

worldmetrics.org9

zipdo.co9

Ninety-seven of the ninety-seven domain citations in answers naming ContractZen came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/corporate-governance-software14

anywherer.com/best-corporate-entity-management-software9

coverpin.com/resources/top-10-entity-management-tools-compared9

techbullion.com/the-6-best-entity-management-tools-in-20268

f6s.com/software/category/corporate-governance7

g2.com/categories/entity-management7

capterra.com/entity-management-software6

diliforce.com/en/blog/top-softwares-for-smarter-entity-management-in-20266

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ContractZen

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ContractZen; a claim can dispute any of them.

ContractZen Governance Suite 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ContractZen's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ContractZen, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at contra.agency is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.