Entity management · September 2026 Edition
Diligent Entities vs Diligent
One of twelve models named Diligent Entities first on the direct prompt; zero named Diligent. Diligent Entities was named by twelve of the twelve models and Diligent by eight and Diligent Entities carries 31 labels and Diligent 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share3%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate29%64%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels3111A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Diligent Entities reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Commenda was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. Athennian vs Diligent Entities · Athennian vs Diligent · EntityKeeper vs Diligent Entities
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the entity management page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
Diligent EntitiesFirst choices, of twelve modelsDiligent
Direct101 against Diligent Entities
Paraphrase011 against Diligent Entities · 4 against Diligent
Comparative201 against Diligent Entities
Budget-constrained004 against Diligent Entities · 1 against Diligent
Scale-constrained001 against Diligent
Negative002 against Diligent Entities · 1 against Diligent
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Diligent Entities and Diligent stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | |||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | ||||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | ||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | |
Diligent Entities Diligent first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Diligent Entities on the left and Diligent on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Diligent Entities and Diligent stood in it.
Diligent Entities first, Diligent not the choice
1 of 12 modelsDiligent was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniDiligent Entities alternatives: Harbor Compliance
Neither was the first choice, one was named
7 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Claude Haiku 4.5Commenda alternatives: Athennian, CT Corporation Entity Management, Diligent Entities
Grok 4.1 FastAthennian alternatives: Carta, Diligent Entities, Pulley
DeepSeek V4 FlashAthennian alternatives: CSC Entity Management, CT Corporation Entity Management, Commenda, Diligent Entities, EntityKeeper
Qwen 3.7 FlashCommenda alternatives: Diligent Entities, LegalX
Kimi K2Filejet alternatives: Athennian, Commenda, Diligent Entities
GLM 4.7 FlashXAthennian alternatives: CSC Entity Management, Commenda, Diligent Entities, EntityKeeper
MiniMax M2.5Commenda alternatives: Athennian, Diligent Entities, GateWay Entities
Neither was named
4 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Gemini 3.5 FlashAthennian alternatives: EntityKeeper, Filejet, MinuteBox
Perplexity SonarCommenda alternatives: Computershare GEMS, Fides
Mistral SmallContractZen alternatives: Commenda, GateWay Entities
Llama 4 MaverickOcorian alternatives: Coverpin, F6S
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Diligent Entities leads by two points.
Diligent Entities2%#8 of 12Diligent0%#12 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
Diligent Entities3%#6 of 12Diligent3%#8 of 12Enterprise
Diligent Entities leads by twenty-two points.
Diligent Entities30%#1 of 8Diligent9%#– of 8What the models said about Diligent Entities
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“What to Avoid: Diligent Entities and similar enterprise solutions - typically start at $15,000-$50,000/year” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Enterprise Tools: Athennian, Diligent Entities, etc., start at $15K+/year—overkill and too pricey” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid enterprise platforms like Diligent Entities or Athennian if budget-constrained” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“Diligent Entities is the industry standard for enterprise governance.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best overall for legal entity management: Diligent Entities” GPT-5.4 mini · direct prompt · first choice
“the enterprise standard for multinationals” DeepSeek V4 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about Diligent
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Legacy Systems (e.g., Diligent, CSC Entity Management): Often highly robust ... but can feel clunky, require heavy training, have longer implementation times, and carry higher price tags.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Many legacy systems (like Diligent, Mitratech, or CSC) are designed for large multinationals, hide their pricing ... often start at tens of thousands of dollars per year.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“## Top Recommendation: Diligent” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Athennian vs Diligent EntitiesAthennian vs DiligentEntityKeeper vs Diligent EntitiesEntityKeeper vs DiligentCommenda vs Diligent EntitiesCommenda vs DiligentContractZen vs Diligent EntitiesContractZen vs DiligentFilejet vs Diligent EntitiesFilejet vs DiligentDiligent Entities vs MinuteBoxMinuteBox vs DiligentAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full entity management standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.