Entity management · September 2026 Edition
Filejet vs Diligent
One of twelve models named Filejet first on the direct prompt; zero named Diligent. Filejet was named by eight of the twelve models and Diligent by eight and Filejet carries 14 labels and Diligent 11, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share8%3%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%64%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#8A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.
Labels1411A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Filejet reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Diligent Entities was named alongside these two in eight of the twelve direct answers. Athennian vs Filejet · Athennian vs Diligent · EntityKeeper vs Filejet
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the entity management page.
By framing
How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FilejetFirst choices, of twelve modelsDiligent
Direct10
Paraphrase014 against Diligent
Comparative00
Budget-constrained201 against Diligent
Scale-constrained001 against Diligent
Negative001 against Diligent
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.
Every model, every framing
The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Filejet and Diligent stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | ||||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | |||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | | |
| Perplexity Sonar | | |||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | |||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | |||||
| Llama 4 Maverick | ||||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | ||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 |
Filejet Diligent first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Filejet on the left and Diligent on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Filejet and Diligent stood in it.
Filejet first, Diligent not the choice
1 of 12 modelsDiligent was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Kimi K2Filejet alternatives: Athennian, Commenda, Diligent Entities
Neither was the first choice, one was named
1 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Gemini 3.5 FlashAthennian alternatives: EntityKeeper, Filejet, MinuteBox
Neither was named
10 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Commenda alternatives: Athennian, CT Corporation Entity Management, Diligent Entities
GPT-5.4 miniDiligent Entities alternatives: Harbor Compliance
Perplexity SonarCommenda alternatives: Computershare GEMS, Fides
Grok 4.1 FastAthennian alternatives: Carta, Diligent Entities, Pulley
Mistral SmallContractZen alternatives: Commenda, GateWay Entities
DeepSeek V4 FlashAthennian alternatives: CSC Entity Management, CT Corporation Entity Management, Commenda, Diligent Entities, EntityKeeper
Llama 4 MaverickOcorian alternatives: Coverpin, F6S
Qwen 3.7 FlashCommenda alternatives: Diligent Entities, LegalX
GLM 4.7 FlashXAthennian alternatives: CSC Entity Management, Commenda, Diligent Entities, EntityKeeper
MiniMax M2.5Commenda alternatives: Athennian, Diligent Entities, GateWay Entities
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Filejet leads by seven points.
Filejet7%#5 of 12Diligent0%#12 of 12Mid-marketThe figures above
Enterprise
The order flips: Diligent leads at enterprise.
Diligent9%#– of 8Filejet0%#– of 8What the models said about Filejet
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“For most small companies, EntityKeeper or Filejet are the best starting points due to their low cost” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Filejet (Best Overall Value) ... widely considered one of the most transparent and budget-friendly options” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Start with FileJet if you want the best balance of automation, transparent pricing, and value” Kimi K2 · direct prompt · first choice
What the models said about Diligent
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.
“Legacy Systems (e.g., Diligent, CSC Entity Management): Often highly robust ... but can feel clunky, require heavy training, have longer implementation times, and carry higher price tags.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · soft negative
“Many legacy systems (like Diligent, Mitratech, or CSC) are designed for large multinationals, hide their pricing ... often start at tens of thousands of dollars per year.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“## Top Recommendation: Diligent” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Also compared
Athennian vs FilejetAthennian vs DiligentEntityKeeper vs FilejetEntityKeeper vs DiligentCommenda vs FilejetCommenda vs DiligentContractZen vs FilejetContractZen vs DiligentFilejet vs Diligent EntitiesFilejet vs MinuteBoxDiligent Entities vs DiligentMinuteBox vs DiligentAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full entity management standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.