Finance AI Index
Index Planning and analysis Board › Boardable vs BoardPro
Board and investor reporting · September 2026 Edition

Boardable vs BoardPro

Zero of twelve models named Boardable first on the direct prompt; zero named BoardPro. Boardable was named by twelve of the twelve models and BoardPro by eleven and Boardable carries 25 labels and BoardPro 22, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Boardable

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

BoardPro

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

First-choice share14%7%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate4%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#2#3A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels2522A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Boardable reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.OnBoard was named alongside these two in nine of the twelve direct answers. OnBoard vs Boardable · OnBoard vs BoardPro

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the board and investor reporting page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
BoardableFirst choices, of twelve modelsBoardPro
Direct001 against Boardable
Paraphrase00
Comparative01
Budget-constrained63
Scale-constrained00
Negative00
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Boardable and BoardPro stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

2 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniOnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, BoardPro, Diligent Boards, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Grok 4.1 FastOnBoard alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, BoardPro, iBabs

Neither was named

10 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5OnBoard alternatives: Aprio Board Portal, Board Intelligence, HighRadius
Gemini 3.5 FlashMosaic, OnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, Cube, Datarails, Govenda, Jirav
Perplexity SonarOnBoard alternatives: Board Intelligence, BoardEffect, Nasdaq Boardvantage
Mistral SmallNasdaq Boardvantage alternatives: BoardEffect, Datarails, Fairview
DeepSeek V4 FlashOnBoard alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, Fairview
Llama 4 MaverickNasdaq Boardvantage alternatives: Datarails, Fairview
Qwen 3.7 FlashDiligent alternatives: Enboarder, Fello, OnBoard
Kimi K2Datarails alternatives: Cube, Planful
GLM 4.7 FlashXAprio Board Portal, OnBoard alternatives: AppDeck Board Portal, BoardEffect, Govenda, Nasdaq Boardvantage
MiniMax M2.5OnBoard alternatives: BoardEffect, Datarails, Planful

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Level: the same share of first choices.
Boardable20%#2 of 10
BoardPro20%#3 of 10
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Boardable leads by seven points.
Boardable14%#2 of 14
BoardPro7%#3 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: BoardPro leads at enterprise.
BoardPro2%#– of 9
Boardable0%#– of 9
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Boardable

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Limited governance depth; fewer advanced features; overkill for larger or complex boards” GLM 4.7 FlashX · direct prompt · soft negative
“If you need a simple, affordable solution for a small board and are comfortable with manual setup: Boardable (Core) or Google Workspace.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“For the most affordable and straightforward solution, Boardable is likely the best choice if your needs are basic.” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Boardable if you have a very small board (under 10 members) and want the lowest per-user cost” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about BoardPro

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“If you want the best value with more features: BoardPro offers the best balance of price and functionality” MiniMax M2.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall for SMBs; repeatable board packs with controlled approvals and audit trails” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
“For most companies on a tight budget, BoardPro is the sweet spot” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.