Three of twelve models named Bloomberg Tax Provision first on the direct prompt; zero named Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE. Bloomberg Tax Provision was named by eleven of the twelve models and Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE by nine and Bloomberg Tax Provision carries 43 labels and Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE 19, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in three categories this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the corporate tax provision page.
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“Bloomberg Tax Provision: An enterprise-grade platform with high implementation overhead.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“significantly cheaper than enterprise solutions like Bloomberg (often $50k-$100k+)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Deep analytics, but lighter on full compliance | Costly for pure filing needs” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Frequently the "go-to" for mid-market companies. It is highly regarded for its transparent calculations (no black box), rapid implementation, and excellent customer support.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“If you want the absolute best mix of rapid setup (<2 months), robust calculation, and intuitive interface, choose Bloomberg Tax Provision.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Corptax or Bloomberg if you need comprehensive enterprise-grade automation with the highest audit standards” Kimi K2 · comparative prompt · first choice
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.
“Enterprise Options to AVOID on a Limited Budget | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE | $200K–$2M+/year” Kimi K2 · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Longview, ONESOURCE, Workiva, Oracle Tax Reporting, and Corptax.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“cannot justify the six-figure price tag of enterprise suites like Bloomberg or Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“Choose Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE if you are a larger, audited mid-market C-Corp with multiple subsidiaries” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE as the top choice for income tax compliance software” Grok 4.1 Fast · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Corporate income tax (direct tax) | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE or Vertex” GLM 4.7 FlashX · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.