Thomson Reuters · 3 categories · RankedThomson Reuters ONESOURCE
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corporate tax provision | Tax and compliance | 10% | 3 of 98 | 16% | 19 | accepted challenger |
| Sales tax automation | Tax and compliance | 0% | 18 of 38 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara AvaTax at 40% |
| Global e-invoicing compliance | Tax and compliance | 0% | 33 of 108 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Avalara at 28% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE if you are a larger, audited mid-market C-Corp with multiple subsidiaries” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate tax provision · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE as the top choice for income tax compliance software” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate tax provision · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Corporate income tax (direct tax) | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE or Vertex” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate tax provision · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE” Kimi K2 · Corporate tax provision · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Enterprise Options to AVOID on a Limited Budget | Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE | $200K–$2M+/year” Kimi K2 · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: Longview, ONESOURCE, Workiva, Oracle Tax Reporting, and Corptax.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · hard negative
“cannot justify the six-figure price tag of enterprise suites like Bloomberg or Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · soft negative
“Overkill for most mid-sized firms.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales tax automation · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 84 of the 101 answers that named Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
292 of the 333 domain citations in answers naming Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at thomsonreuters.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.