OFX vs Thunes
Zero of twelve models named OFX first on the direct prompt; one named Thunes. OFX was named by seven of the twelve models and Thunes by eight and both carry 13 labels, so the shares below are directly comparable.
Named in two categories this edition.
Named in one category this edition.
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the Cross-border payments and FX page.
By framing
OFXFirst choices, of twelve modelsThunes
Every model, every framing
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | ||||||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | ||||||
| Perplexity Sonar | ||||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | |||||
| Mistral Small | | | ||||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | ||
| Llama 4 Maverick | | |||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | |||||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | |||
| MiniMax M2.5 | |
OFX Thunes first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, OFX on the left and Thunes on the right.The direct prompt
Thunes first, OFX not the choice
1 of 12 modelsOFX was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Neither was the first choice, one was named
5 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Neither was named
6 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
Thunes22%#1 of 12OFX0%#– of 12What the models said about OFX
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.
“OFX or XE Business become competitive only when you reach higher monthly volumes (≥$50k)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · soft negative
“OFX is excellent if you want a slightly more agile interface with strong personal support” Qwen 3.7 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For a true "FX hedging + payments" combo in one tool, OFX is my top pick” DeepSeek V4 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best for Large Transfers + FX Hedging ... If you need simple hedging for large occasional payments: → OFX” Kimi K2 · paraphrase prompt · alternative
What the models said about Thunes
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“Thunes: Best overall for global B2B payouts at scale, covering 140+ countries and 90 currencies.” Mistral Small · comparative prompt · first choice
“Thunes is considered the best overall for global B2B payouts” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice
“Thunes (Best for Enterprise & Infrastructure)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.