Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Blue Yonder · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Blue Yonder

8Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Blue Yonder was named 5 times in Treasury management syst, where Trovata led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market123 of 124

under the label threshold

Enterprise26 of 88

under the label threshold

In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Blue Yonder for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	0%	123 of 124	60%	5	under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Blue Yonder yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Blue Yonder across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“you want to stay away from "enterprise" tools (like Blue Yonder) which are often too rigid for a scaling company” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“What to Avoid (For Mid-Market) ... Powerful but complex; 12-24 month implementations; enterprise pricing” Kimi K2 · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“Avoid enterprise like Oracle/Blue Yonder” Grok 4.1 Fast · Treasury management syst · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Blue Yonder, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Blue Yonder was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Oracle Transportation Management4 of 82Not in the top three

MercuryGate3 of 81Not in the top three

E2open3 of 80Not in the top three

Kinaxis2 of 80Not in the top three

Oracle2 of 80Not in the top three

SAP TM2 of 80Not in the top three

3G TMS1 of 81Not in the top three

AscendTMS1 of 81Not in the top three

MercuryGate TMS1 of 81Not in the top three

3Gtms1 of 80Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Blue Yonder. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 8 answers that named Blue Yonder and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com5

worldmetrics.org5

elevatiq.com4

gofreight.com4

solutionsreview.com4

gocomet.com3

softwareadvice.com3

suitefleet.com3

blogs.oracle.com2

cargoson.com2

Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming Blue Yonder came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/transportation-management-systems5

elevatiq.com/post/top-tms-systems4

gocomet.com/blog/top-transportation-management-systems-for-mid-market-businesses3

gofreight.com/blog/best-tms-software3

softwareadvice.com/scm/transportation-management-software-comparison3

solutionsreview.com/enterprise-resource-planning/the-best-transportation-management-system3

suitefleet.com/blog/best-tms-system-in-20263

blogs.oracle.com/scm/oracle-leader-17th-time-gartner-magic-quadrant-transportation-managem2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Blue Yonder

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Blue Yonder; a claim can dispute any of them.

Blue Yonder (JDA) 1Blue Yonder (formerly JDA/BluJay) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Blue Yonder's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Blue Yonder, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at blueyonder.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.