Index › Products › Accointing · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Accointing

8Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Accointing was named 4 times in Crypto accounting, where Bitwave led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business40 of 52

under the label threshold

Mid-market44 of 54

under the label threshold

Enterprise38 of 46

under the label threshold

In crypto accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Accointing for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Crypto accounting	Accounting and close	0%	44 of 54	50%	4	under 10 labels · led by Bitwave at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Accointing yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Accointing across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Standalone Accointing services have been phased out. Ensure you are migrating to newer, supported ecosystems rather than relying on legacy Accointing CSV exports.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · hard negative

“"Some online reviews have mentioned that getting amazing customer support from Accointing isn't always a guarantee."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Accointing, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Accointing was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Koinly7 of 82Not among the top eight

CoinLedger5 of 81Not among the top eight

ZenLedger5 of 80Not among the top eight

CoinTracker4 of 80Not among the top eight

CoinTracking4 of 80Not among the top eight

Cryptio4 of 80Not among the top eight

Bitwave3 of 82Not among the top eight

Blockpit3 of 80Not among the top eight

TRES Finance3 of 80Not among the top eight

TaxBit3 of 80Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Accointing. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 8 answers that named Accointing and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

fitsmallbusiness.com4

spark.money4

aicostadvisory.com3

breezing.io3

coinbureau.com3

cointracker.com3

crm.org3

g2.com3

gitnux.org3

koinly.io3

No domain is on file for Accointing, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-cryptocurrency-accounting-software4

spark.money/tools/crypto-accounting-software-comparison4

aicostadvisory.com/c/crypto-accounting/guide3

crm.org/news/best-crypto-tax-software3

g2.com/categories/crypto-accounting3

coinledger.io/tools/best-crypto-accounting-software2

cointracker.com/blog/how-to-pick-the-best-crypto-tax-software2

cryptolicenses.net/crypto-accounting/software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Accointing

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Accointing's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Accointing, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Accointing by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Accointing is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Accointing, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.