Every category where a model named ZenLedger for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Crypto accounting	Accounting and close	0%	20 of 54	36%	11	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ZenLedger yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ZenLedger across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	2	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	1	3
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative8 labelsNone

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative13 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Stick to highly rated options like Koinly, ZenLedger, TokenTax” Grok 4.1 Fast · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · first choice

“Best for tax-heavy, detailed filings: ZenLedger or CryptoTaxCalculator.” Perplexity Sonar · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“The free plan of ZenLedger is among the best free crypto tax apps on the market.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for: DeFi, staking, NFTs (100+ protocols).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Mid-market sweet spot: Avoid consumer tools (ZenLedger/Koinly – tax-only, not full accounting).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · hard negative

“rated poorly by professional accountants because they frequently misclassify complex transactions” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · soft negative

“ZenLedger (Exercise Caution with Complex DeFi & Conversions)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · soft negative

“they are not true double-entry subledgers” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ZenLedger, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ZenLedger was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Koinly27 of 297Not among the top eight

CoinLedger23 of 296Not among the top eight

Cryptio21 of 293Not among the top eight

Bitwave17 of 297Not among the top eight

CoinTracker16 of 290Not among the top eight

Cryptoworth14 of 294Not among the top eight

TRES Finance13 of 293Not among the top eight

TokenTax10 of 290Not among the top eight

Ledgible9 of 292Not among the top eight

CoinTracking9 of 290Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ZenLedger. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 29 answers that named ZenLedger and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

spark.money20

fitsmallbusiness.com17

coinledger.io16

g2.com15

breezing.io14

gitnux.org14

founderscpa.com10

koinly.io10

milkroad.com10

rfp.wiki10

136 of the 136 domain citations in answers naming ZenLedger came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

spark.money/tools/crypto-accounting-software-comparison20

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-cryptocurrency-accounting-software17

g2.com/categories/crypto-accounting13

coinledger.io/tools/best-crypto-accounting-software10

founderscpa.com/blog/best-crypto-accounting-software10

milkroad.com/tax/accounting10

breezing.io/blog/best-crypto-accounting-subledger-tools8

gitnux.org/best/blockchain-accounting-software8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

zenledger.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, ZenLedger takes 0% of first choices and Bitwave takes 27%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “crypto accounting platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “crypto accounting platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 720 a month (“zenledger”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 5 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 5,788 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 4,104 · 32 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 4,652
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

11 ads · 5 image, 3 text, 3 video · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2024, as ZenLedger, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 4 in the year, 7 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 20 of 54 in crypto accounting

Segment leader

27%

Bitwave

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 29 answers
Its own site cited: in 29 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on zenledger.io

1,310

subdomains included

Content

950

counted in the table below

Documentation

129

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	784	0	2026-03-28	Crypto accounting, Accounting software
Comparison	61	2	2026-08-20
News or press	56	undated
Glossary or explainer	37	undated
Template or tool	6	undated
Webinar or virtual event	2	undated
Report or ebook	2	undated
Podcast or video	2	undated

Most recent

2026-08-204632598 tax professional plan vs diy plan comparison
2026-08-1714319011 what are the alternatives if csv uploads for crypto tax forms are not supported in turbotax comparison
2026-03-28How to file a tax extension 2026 crypto 1099 da safe harbor blog
2026-03-25Stablecoin rewards may get restricted in the clarity act draft what it means for usdc holders coinbase rewards and defi blog
2026-03-20Irs extends crypto lot selection relief through 2026 how to avoid fifo surprises and fix 1099 da mismatches blog
2025-12-08Zenledger now supports the sui blockchain blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page zenledger.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow ZenLedger

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ZenLedger is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Best Crypto Tax Software | Simplify Crypto Taxes with ZenLedger; The Most Intuitive and Accurate Crypto Tax Software for Cryptocurrency, DeFi, and NFT Data Needs.
zenledger.io
For: investors and tax professionals
zenledger.io
Price stated: Competitively priced plans to meet your specific trading needs. Access the report forever, so you can always update or add transactions before printing and filing your tax forms. zenledger.io
Starting price: 0 zenledger.io
Free plan or trial: free crypto tax software plan; Get Started for Free zenledger.io
Integrations claimed: 400 zenledger.io
Certifications: AICPA Logosoc-2-type-2SOC 2AICPA
Hosting: United States
Not stated on the pages read: Customers

What ZenLedger's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: zenledger.io, zenledger.io/pricing, zenledger.io/security, zenledger.io/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ZenLedger's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ZenLedger, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ZenLedger by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where ZenLedger is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name ZenLedger, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.