AI Indexes
Finance AI Index
Index › Products › TaxBit · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

TaxBit

44Judge labels
2First choices
8Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Crypto accounting for enterprise buyers
Rank 10 of 54 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 9% of its 11 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of TaxBit →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In crypto accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named TaxBit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Crypto accountingAccounting and close2%10 of 549%11accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for TaxBit yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated TaxBit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01113
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.510001
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative15 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained8 labelsNone
Negative9 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Bitwave and TaxBit are frequently recommended due to their scalability and comprehensive feature sets” MiniMax M2.5 · Crypto accounting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“It is more expensive than the options above but offers the highest level of data granularity and security features” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Crypto accounting · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“TaxBit | Tax compliance focus, IRS partnership, exchange-grade” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Crypto accounting · scale prompt · alternative
“TaxBit - IRS-compliant with good security practices” Kimi K2 · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“TaxBit – *Avoid for retail/individual users* ... Unless you are a large fund with a dedicated accountant, stay away.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as TaxBit, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and TaxBit was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bitwave34 of 4413Not among the top eight
Cryptio31 of 442Not among the top eight
Koinly21 of 447Not among the top eight
TRES Finance20 of 444Not among the top eight
CoinTracker17 of 441Not among the top eight
Cryptoworth17 of 441Not among the top eight
Lukka14 of 440Not among the top eight
SoftLedger12 of 441Not among the top eight
CoinLedger11 of 443Not among the top eight
Ledgible11 of 441Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named TaxBit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 41 of the 44 answers that named TaxBit and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

spark.money26
bitwave.io24
fitsmallbusiness.com20
tres.finance20
coinledger.io19
g2.com14
node40.com14
techdogs.com14
cryptoworth.com13
breezing.io12

176 of the 176 domain citations in answers naming TaxBit came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

taxbit.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, TaxBit takes 2% of first choices and Bitwave takes 27%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “crypto accounting platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “crypto accounting platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
1,300 a month (“taxbit”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
17 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 4,748 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,353 · 25 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,398
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 3 clicks and $5 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
46 ads · 46 text · 27 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2023, as TaxBit, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 21 in the year, 25 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 10 of 54 in crypto accounting
Segment leader
27%
Bitwave
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
44 answers
Its own site cited
in 41 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on taxbit.com
835
subdomains included
Content
289
counted in the table below
Documentation
54
Product · Integration
16 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog23152026-09-25
Webinar or virtual event2002025-04-29
Report or ebook1202023-09-26
Glossary or explainer912026-07-24
Case study6undated
Conference or event502025-05-22
News or press302023-02-28
Comparison222026-09-16
Template or tool102021-05-13
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page taxbit.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as TaxBit

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as TaxBit; a claim can dispute any of them.
Taxbit 1

Follow TaxBit

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

TaxBit is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Global regulatory reporting for the digital economy
For
Compliance teams
Certifications
SOC2SOC 1 Type 2SOC 2 Type 2ISO 27001:2022ISO 27001, 27701, and 27017GDPRSOC 2
Customers named
PayPalRipioNYDIGZero HashUphold
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting

What TaxBit's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: taxbit.com, trust.taxbit.com, taxbit.com/platform, taxbit.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when TaxBit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as TaxBit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for TaxBit by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where TaxBit is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name TaxBit, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at taxbit.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.