Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Agicap · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Agicap

94Judge labels
24First choices
14Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
21% in Treasury management syst for small business buyers
Rank 1 of 86 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 24 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In cash flow forecasting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Agicap for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Cash flow forecastingTreasury and cash18%1 of 864%24accepted challenger
Treasury management systemsTreasury and cash11%2 of 12412%17accepted challenger
Business bill payTreasury and cash0%38 of 690%1under 10 labels · led by BILL at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Agicap yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Agicap across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini20103
Gemini 3.5 Flash15006
Perplexity Sonar21003
Grok 4.1 Fast11305
Mistral Small20103
DeepSeek V4 Flash12115
Llama 4 Maverick01203
Qwen 3.7 Flash10012
Kimi K203115
GLM 4.7 FlashX20002
MiniMax M2.520204

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct17 labels8
Paraphrase13 labels8
Comparative16 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained22 labels7
Scale-constrained8 labels1
Negative18 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative94 labels in all, every segment counted; 24 of the 29 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Agicap is a strong choice for smaller businesses wanting a modular, scalable treasury and cash flow management tool” Mistral Small · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · first choice
“likely the strongest fit if you want a real treasury/cash-management tool without going straight to enterprise pricing” GPT-5.4 mini · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · first choice
“For most mid‑sized B2B companies ... Agicap is the most frequently recommended option in recent reviews.” MiniMax M2.5 · Cash flow forecasting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“For a very tight budget, start with Trezy or Agicap's free versions” MiniMax M2.5 · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Caution with: Agicap (specifically for non-European or complex German setups).” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · soft negative
“Better suited for SMB cash flow management than sophisticated treasury operations” Kimi K2 · Treasury management syst · negative prompt · soft negative
“Caution level: High — but not a flat "avoid"” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Agicap, over the 94 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Agicap was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Float33 of 9411Not in the top three
GTreasury30 of 943Not in the top three
HighRadius21 of 943Not in the top three
Centime20 of 945Not in the top three
TreasuryView17 of 942Not in the top three
Cash Flow Frog14 of 941Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Agicap. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 82 of the 94 answers that named Agicap and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com53
gartner.com50
treasuryview.com30
agicap.comYour site27
guideflow.com23
worldmetrics.org23
capterra.com22
pikaseo.com21
centime.com17
tesorio.com17

256 of the 283 domain citations in answers naming Agicap came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Agicap's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Agicap, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at agicap.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.