Every category where a model named Centime for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	7%	6 of 124	0%	10	accepted challenger
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	4%	10 of 86	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%
Accounts receivable automation	Receivables and billing	0%	34 of 77	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Books at 15%
Accounts payable automation	Spend and procurement	0%	41 of 60	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Stampli at 19%
Business banking	Treasury and cash	0%	31 of 78	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Mercury at 20%
Cash application	Receivables and billing	0%	54 of 83	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by HighRadius at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Centime yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Centime across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	3	1	7
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	2	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels3

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative16 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labels2

Scale-constrained6 labels1

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative45 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Centime is ideal for SMBs and mid-market businesses seeking comprehensive treasury management without the enterprise-level price tag” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · first choice

“I'd suggest starting with Centime or Trovata as they specifically target this market segment” MiniMax M2.5 · Treasury management syst · direct prompt · first choice

“Centime is one of the strongest and most cost-effective choices” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · first choice

“2. Centime (Best All-in-One Working Capital Platform)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Centime, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Centime was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Agicap20 of 454Not in the top three

Kyriba20 of 453Not in the top three

HighRadius16 of 457Not in the top three

Trovata14 of 453Not in the top three

Tesorio13 of 451Not in the top three

BILL11 of 454Not in the top three

GTreasury11 of 451Not in the top three

Chaser10 of 451Not in the top three

TreasuryView9 of 452Not in the top three

Upflow9 of 451Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Centime. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 45 answers that named Centime and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

centime.comYour site24

gartner.com18

g2.com15

treasuryview.com14

highradius.com13

chaserhq.com11

nilus.com10

rho.co9

worldmetrics.org9

getapp.com8

107 of the 131 domain citations in answers naming Centime came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

centime.com/llm-pages/top-treasury-management-solutions17

gartner.com/reviews/market/treasury-management-systems17

treasuryview.com/en/blog/best-treasury-management-software-for-smbs14

g2.com/categories/treasury-management-systems/small-business12

centime.com/products/treasury-management9

nilus.com/blog/best-treasury-management-software9

rho.co/blog/treasury-management-software8

highradius.com/resources/Blog/top-accounts-receivable-tools7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Centime's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Centime, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at centime.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.