Every category where a model named Kyriba for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	9%	3 of 124	35%	43	criticized challenger
Cross-border payments and FX	Treasury and cash	2%	12 of 83	33%	3	under 10 labels · led by Wise Business at 35%
Cash flow forecasting	Treasury and cash	2%	13 of 86	22%	23	accepted challenger
B2B payment acceptance	Receivables and billing	0%	65 of 91	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Helcim at 17%
FP&A platforms	Planning and analysis	0%	44 of 52	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Vena at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kyriba yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kyriba across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	2	1	4
GPT-5.4 mini	2	1	0	2	5
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	3	0	4	8
Perplexity Sonar	3	2	0	1	6
Grok 4.1 Fast	3	2	1	2	8
Mistral Small	1	2	2	1	6
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2	1	3	8
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	1	3	6
Kimi K2	3	1	1	2	7
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	0	2	5
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	2	2	6

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct40 labels14

Paraphrase38 labels22

Comparative53 labels30not counted in share

Budget-constrained35 labels13

Scale-constrained26 labels5

Negative29 labels7not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative221 labels in all, every segment counted; 54 of the 91 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“the best treasury management system is usually Kyriba if you want the most complete, enterprise-grade platform with strong midmarket fit” Perplexity Sonar · Treasury management syst · direct prompt · first choice

“The best treasury management software in 2026 for most enterprise buyers is Kyriba (enterprise cash and payments suite) or GTreasury” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · first choice

“Kyriba is the clear market leader in cloud-native, multi-tenant TMS solutions. It is the default choice for large multinationals” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · first choice

“Kyriba is the strongest default choice ... choose Kyriba for most mid-market B2B companies with real treasury complexity” GPT-5.4 mini · Treasury management syst · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“If you are a small business or a mid-market company, avoid these platforms.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Cash flow forecasting · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid: Big-name enterprise platforms (Kyriba, GTreasury, FIS Integrity)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · hard negative

“Enterprise systems like Kyriba or SAP Treasury are likely too expensive” Kimi K2 · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · hard negative

“Kyriba / SAP BTP | $10k+ / Month | High (Avoid if budget is tight)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Treasury management syst · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kyriba, over the 221 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kyriba was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

GTreasury110 of 2211Not in the top three

Trovata79 of 22112Compare →

HighRadius73 of 2219Not in the top three

SAP Treasury and Risk Management68 of 2210Not in the top three

Agicap59 of 22120Compare →

ION Treasury38 of 2210Not in the top three

Float34 of 2214Not in the top three

Anaplan34 of 2210Not in the top three

Nomentia34 of 2210Not in the top three

Tesorio29 of 2217Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kyriba. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 178 of the 221 answers that named Kyriba and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com108

g2.com67

treasury.ripple.com64

eco.com59

worldmetrics.org57

highradius.com47

checkthat.ai46

debtbook.com45

nomentia.com37

guideflow.com35

565 of the 565 domain citations in answers naming Kyriba came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/treasury-management-systems88

eco.com/support/en/articles/16402412-best-treasury-management-software-202658

treasury.ripple.com/posts/top-10-treasury-management-systems54

debtbook.com/blog/best-treasury-management-systems43

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-treasury-management-software-tools34

treasuryview.com/en/blog/best-treasury-management-software-for-smbs30

gfmag.com/transaction-banking/best-treasury-cash-management-providers-2024-systems-service29

g2.com/categories/treasury-management-systems/small-business27

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Kyriba

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Kyriba; a claim can dispute any of them.

Kyriba (Essentials Edition) 1Kyriba (Essentials for Mid‑Market) 1Kyriba Essentials 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kyriba's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kyriba, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at kyriba.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.