Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Avalara · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Avalara

90Judge labels
24First choices
19Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
28% in Global e-invoicing compl for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 108 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
7 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 4% of its 28 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In global e-invoicing compl · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Avalara for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Global e-invoicing complianceTax and compliance28%1 of 1084%28accepted challenger
Corporate tax provisionTax and compliance7%5 of 9827%11criticized challenger
Contractor paymentsSpend and procurement0%65 of 8350%2under 10 labels · led by Deel at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Avalara yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Avalara across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501203
GPT-5.4 mini30115
Gemini 3.5 Flash11013
Perplexity Sonar30003
Grok 4.1 Fast11125
Mistral Small20002
DeepSeek V4 Flash21216
Llama 4 Maverick21003
Qwen 3.7 Flash12003
Kimi K211103
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.511103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels8
Paraphrase43 labels13
Comparative10 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained11 labels3
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative90 labels in all, every segment counted; 24 of the 25 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Overall for Mid-Market B2B: Avalara ... Start with Avalara if you want the best balance of B2B features, mid-market fit, and integration ecosystem.” Kimi K2 · Global e-invoicing compl · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“my default recommendation would be Avalara if you need broad VAT compliance coverage, ERP integrations, and room to scale” Perplexity Sonar · Global e-invoicing compl · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I would recommend Avalara as the default choice if you need broad, scalable compliance coverage and ERP integration.” Perplexity Sonar · Corporate tax provision · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Avalara or SAP Ariba if you have larger invoice volumes and international operations” MiniMax M2.5 · Global e-invoicing compl · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms like *Avalara AvaTax*, *TaxJar*, or *Anrok* ... they do not file corporate income taxes” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate tax provision · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pure 1099 filers like Track1099/Avalara” Grok 4.1 Fast · Contractor payments · budget prompt · hard negative
“Automated sales tax tools improperly configured (e.g., Avalara) ... "garbage in, garbage out."” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate tax provision · negative prompt · soft negative
“but those are generally more enterprise-oriented and not the best fit for a limited budget” GPT-5.4 mini · Global e-invoicing compl · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Avalara, over the 90 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Avalara was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Vertex32 of 907Not in the top three
Pagero24 of 906Not in the top three
Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE19 of 906Not in the top three
Basware19 of 900Not in the top three
Tipalti14 of 900Not in the top three
Xero12 of 904Not in the top three
TaxJar12 of 901Not in the top three
QuickBooks Online9 of 903Not in the top three
Bloomberg Tax Provision9 of 900Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Avalara. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 80 of the 90 answers that named Avalara and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

avalara.comYour site38
worldmetrics.org35
zipdo.co33
g2.com30
gartner.com30
gitnux.org30
wifitalents.com27
mindsprint.com24
vatit.com20
apsentra.com15

244 of the 282 domain citations in answers naming Avalara came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Avalara

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Avalara; a claim can dispute any of them.
Avalara E-Invoicing and Live Reporting 2Avalara (AvaTax & Avalara VAT) 1Avalara (AvaTax) 1Avalara 1099 1Avalara/Vertex 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Avalara's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Avalara, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at avalara.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.