Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Cadel · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Cadel

3Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Cadel was named 3 times in Revenue recognition, where Maxio led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market17 of 77

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In revenue recognition · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Cadel for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Revenue recognition	Accounting and close	2%	17 of 77	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cadel yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cadel across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Cadel.ai - Automates the full ASC 606 workflow, including contract parsing, revenue scheduling, and journal entry posting.” Llama 4 Maverick · Revenue recognition · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Cadel is designed specifically to automate ASC 606 for the US mid-market” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Revenue recognition · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Cadel (Best for Contract-to-Journal Workflow)” MiniMax M2.5 · Revenue recognition · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cadel, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cadel was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

RightRev3 of 30Not in the top three

LedgerUp2 of 31Not in the top three

Sage Intacct2 of 30Not in the top three

Maxio1 of 31Not in the top three

Ordway1 of 31Not in the top three

Chargebee RevRec1 of 30Not in the top three

NetSuite Advanced Revenue Management1 of 30Not in the top three

NetSuite RevRec AI1 of 30Not in the top three

Oracle RevPro1 of 30Not in the top three

Tabs1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cadel. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 3 answers that named Cadel and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cadel.aiYour site2

ledgerup.ai2

chatfin.ai1

eleven.run1

rightrev.com1

tabs.com1

zipdo.co1

Seven of the nine domain citations in answers naming Cadel came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cadel.ai/us/revenue-recognition2

ledgerup.ai/resources/best-asc-606-revenue-recognition-software-20262

chatfin.ai/blog/is-your-cfo-using-ai/top-10-ai-tools-for-revenue-recognition-asc-606-ifrs-1

eleven.run/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software1

ledgerup.ai/asc-6061

rightrev.com/solutions-asc-6061

tabs.com/blog/best-revenue-reporting-software1

zipdo.co/best/asc-606-revenue-recognition-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Cadel

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cadel; a claim can dispute any of them.

Cadel.ai 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cadel's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cadel, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cadel.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.