| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto accounting | Accounting and close | 14% | 2 of 54 | 13% | 38 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Cryptoworth is specifically positioned for mid-market GL sync, sitting comfortably between enterprise solutions like Bitwave and simpler tax apps” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · first choice
“Cryptoworth often cited as the best overall for mid-market needs due to its comprehensive features and compliance support” Mistral Small · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest evaluating Cryptoworth or Ledgible first due to their transparent pricing and mid-market focus” Kimi K2 · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · first choice
“In that segment Cryptoworth is consistently called out as the mid-market fit.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Platforms with Consistent Negative Feedback Cryptoworth - Slow performance and lag when processing large transaction volumes” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms with Significant Issues ... Cryptoworth ... Slow performance with lags and refresh needs” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · hard negative
“positioned as a sub-ledger and may not cover payroll, treasury, or B2B payment workflows” Perplexity Sonar · Crypto accounting · negative prompt · soft negative
“Easier to implement but may lack some advanced features” MiniMax M2.5 · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 92 of the 92 answers that named Cryptoworth and are not a share of its labels.
389 of the 436 domain citations in answers naming Cryptoworth came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 309 | 0 | 2025-04-01 | Crypto accounting, Accounting software | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 29 | 1 | 2026-09-12 | Crypto accounting | |
| Comparison | 14 | 1 | 2026-09-12 | Crypto accounting | |
| Case study | 11 | undated | Crypto accounting | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | undated | Crypto accounting, Accounting software | ||
| Conference or event | 5 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 4 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Every page cryptoworth.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Cryptoworth's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cryptoworth.com, cryptoworth.com/pricing, cryptoworth.com/security, cryptoworth.com/platform, cryptoworth.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cryptoworth's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cryptoworth, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cryptoworth by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
Cryptoworth is among the products AI models recommend first in Crypto accounting this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.