1 category · RankedLedgible
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crypto accounting | Accounting and close | 5% | 6 of 54 | 8% | 24 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Ledgible across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Ledgible or Cryptio if: You run a business, hold significant assets, need to reconcile accounts monthly, or require audit-ready financial statements” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest evaluating Cryptoworth or Ledgible first due to their transparent pricing and mid-market focus” Kimi K2 · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · first choice
“CryptaCount and Ledgible appear to be the most recommended for mid-market B2B companies based on current reviews.” MiniMax M2.5 · Crypto accounting · direct prompt · first choice
“If you're a firm, institution, or business needing a crypto subledger and GL integration: Ledgible.” GPT-5.4 mini · Crypto accounting · comparative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“not as cost-effective as Breezing for volume)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · hard negative
“Platforms like Ledgible or Cryptio are powerful but typically start at higher price points” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Crypto accounting · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Ledgible, over the 63 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ledgible was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 63 answers that named Ledgible and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
327 of the 327 domain citations in answers naming Ledgible came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
ledgible.io ranks 3 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Ledgible takes 5% of first choices and Bitwave takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“ledgible”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 10 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,666 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 575 · 4 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,210
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 4 across its categories
- Named in
- 63 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 63 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 238 | 11 | 2026-07-31 | Accounting software, Crypto accounting | |
| News or press | 180 | 1 | 2026-08-03 | Accounting software, Crypto accounting | |
| Glossary or explainer | 54 | 0 | 2022-11-24 | ||
| Conference or event | 21 | 0 | 2026-05-11 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 17 | 0 | 2026-02-02 | ||
| Comparison | 8 | 0 | 2022-12-21 | ||
| Podcast or video | 5 | 0 | 2023-02-01 | ||
| Case study | 3 | 0 | 2026-03-03 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2022-08-03 |
Most recent
- 2026-08-032027 the year exchanges and brokers report sales and cost basis to the irs news or press
- 2026-07-31How financial institutions should evaluate digital asset tax reporting vendors blog
- 2026-07-31Before you write an rfp build the right 1099 da operating model blog
- 2026-07-31The four capabilities every 1099 da vendor must demonstrate blog
- 2026-07-31The questions every institution should ask during a 1099 da vendor evaluation blog
- 2026-07-31Why digital asset tax reporting implementations fail before they begin blog
Events in person
- reported May 2026Tax Reporting Group conferenceWashington, D.C. · attended
As the event pages on ledgible.io state them, read October 5, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page ledgible.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Follow Ledgible
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Ledgible is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Ledgible is the leading professional-first digital asset software platform for tax information reporting, cost basis, accounting, and tax.
- For
- institutions, tax pros, and enterprises
- Price stated
- Professional Tax (Starting at $49); Enterprise Accounting (Custom Pricing) ledgible.io/pricing
- Starting price
- 49 ledgible.io/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start 30 Day Trial; Ledgible Crypto Tax Pro is free for Tax Professionals to use. ledgible.io/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC 1 &2 Type 2 AuditedAICPA SOC 1 & 2 Type 2 certifiedAICPAaccounting blockchain coalitionwall street blockchain allianceSOC 1 & 2 audited
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting, customers
What Ledgible's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: ledgible.io, ledgible.io/pricing, ledgible.io/solutions, ledgible.io/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ledgible's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ledgible, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ledgible by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Ledgible is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ledgible, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.