Index › Products › Disputely · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Disputely

4Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

4 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Disputely was named 1 time in Chargeback management, where Chargeflow led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business76 of 92

under the label threshold

Mid-market76 of 81

under the label threshold

Enterprise74 of 82

under the label threshold

In chargeback management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Disputely for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Chargeback management	Receivables and billing	0%	76 of 81	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Chargeflow at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Disputely yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Disputely across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Users have reported it as "probably the worst app" for fighting and preventing chargebacks, with slow responses and poor issue resolution” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Chargeback management · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Disputely, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Disputely was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Chargeflow4 of 41Not among the top eight

Chargeblast2 of 41Not among the top eight

Disputifier2 of 40Not among the top eight

Kolleno1 of 41Not among the top eight

ChargebackStop1 of 40Not among the top eight

Chargebacks9111 of 40Not among the top eight

Ethoca1 of 40Not among the top eight

Gaviti1 of 40Not among the top eight

Justt1 of 40Not among the top eight

Kount1 of 40Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Disputely. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Disputely and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

chargeflow.io4

chargeback.io3

getapp.com3

autods.com2

chargeblast.com2

fitsmallbusiness.com2

g2.com2

gitnux.org2

guideflow.com2

shopiator.com2

No domain is on file for Disputely, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

chargeback.io/blog/best-chargeback-prevention-software3

getapp.com/all-software/chargeback-management3

chargeflow.io/chargebacks-101/chargeback-solutions2

fitsmallbusiness.com/best-chargeback-protection-service2

g2.com/categories/credit-and-collections2

shopiator.com/blog/best-chargeback-prevention-software2

softwareadvice.com/category/4793-chargeback-management2

agentcollect.com/blog/dispute-management-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Disputely

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Disputely's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Disputely, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Disputely by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Disputely is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Disputely, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.