Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Kolleno · September 2026 Edition
6 categories · Ranked

Kolleno

51Judge labels
5First choices
11Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
6Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Cash application for mid-market buyers
Rank 15 of 83 in the mid-market standing
1 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In cash application · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Kolleno for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Cash applicationReceivables and billing2%15 of 830%4under 10 labels · led by HighRadius at 16%
B2B credit managementReceivables and billing2%17 of 8214%7under 10 labels · led by Tesorio at 16%
Accounts receivable automationReceivables and billing0%26 of 770%4under 10 labels · led by Zoho Books at 15%
Account reconciliationAccounting and close0%46 of 720%1under 10 labels · led by FloQast at 33%
Cash flow forecastingTreasury and cash0%62 of 860%1under 10 labels · led by Agicap at 18%
Global e-invoicing complianceTax and compliance0%71 of 1080%1under 10 labels · led by Avalara at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kolleno yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kolleno across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500202
GPT-5.4 mini02103
Gemini 3.5 Flash10102
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00213
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX11103
MiniMax M2.502002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels1
Paraphrase11 labels2
Comparative16 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained12 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative51 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Both Tesorio and Kolleno are AI-powered Accounts Receivable (AR) and credit risk platforms.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · B2B credit management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Kolleno and Esker are strong, mid‑market‑focused all‑rounders.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Cash application · direct prompt · first choice
“Stands out for combining collections, payments, cash application, credit risk, disputes, and forecasting.” GPT-5.4 mini · B2B credit management · comparative prompt · alternative
“Mid‑sized or scaling B2B companies wanting to modernize AR without losing the human touch.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Accounts receivable auto · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Kolleno runs ~$650/user/month—cheap-sounding at first, but it scales badly for small teams.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · B2B credit management · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kolleno, over the 51 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kolleno was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Chaser23 of 516Not in the top three
HighRadius22 of 516Not in the top three
Billtrust22 of 511Not in the top three
Upflow21 of 512Not in the top three
Esker17 of 510Not in the top three
HighRadius Credit Cloud12 of 513Not in the top three
Gaviti11 of 512Not in the top three
Paidnice11 of 511Not in the top three
Tesorio10 of 510Not in the top three
Versapay10 of 510Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kolleno. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 51 answers that named Kolleno and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

chaserhq.com25
highradius.com24
g2.com19
lunos.ai18
rex.inc17
stuut.ai16
kolleno.comYour site15
worldmetrics.org15
cashflowpick.com13
erpresearch.com12

159 of the 174 domain citations in answers naming Kolleno came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kolleno's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kolleno, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at kolleno.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.