Every category where a model named DualEntry for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Accounting software	Accounting and close	4%	6 of 56	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 40%
AI accounting assistants	Accounting and close	2%	13 of 79	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 25%
Revenue recognition	Accounting and close	2%	18 of 77	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Maxio at 15%
B2B payment acceptance	Receivables and billing	0%	41 of 91	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Helcim at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for DualEntry yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated DualEntry across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	1	3
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	2	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels2

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative6 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“DualEntry is an AI-native ERP and accounting platform built for mid-market and pre-IPO companies... good fit for finance teams at high-growth, mid-market, and pre-IPO companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Accounting software · direct prompt · first choice

“DualEntry ranks as the top AI accounting tool with a 4.9 G2 rating and complete workflow automation.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI accounting assistants · comparative prompt · first choice

“DualEntry - provides cloud AI-native general ledger functionality for mid-market organizations.” Llama 4 Maverick · Accounting software · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“DualEntry is currently the most distinct "AI-first" choice for this segment” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI accounting assistants · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as DualEntry, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and DualEntry was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sage Intacct14 of 257Not in the top three

QuickBooks Online9 of 253Not in the top three

Oracle NetSuite8 of 252Not in the top three

Trullion8 of 251Not in the top three

Maxio7 of 253Not in the top three

Vic.ai7 of 251Not in the top three

RightRev6 of 250Not in the top three

Xero5 of 251Not in the top three

Zenskar4 of 251Not in the top three

Chargebee RevRec4 of 250Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named DualEntry. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named DualEntry and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

dualentry.comYour site20

worldmetrics.org11

getapp.com9

guideflow.com7

ledgerup.ai7

pipedrive.com7

ramp.com6

gotofu.com5

softwarefinder.com5

zipdo.co5

Sixty-two of the eighty-two domain citations in answers naming DualEntry came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

dualentry.com/blog/best-ai-accounting-software7

dualentry.com/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software7

ledgerup.ai/resources/7-best-revenue-recognition-software-for-saas-20267

pipedrive.com/en/blog/best-revenue-recognition-software7

dualentry.com/blog/best-general-ledger-software5

getapp.com/all-software/revenue-recognition/org/mid-size-business5

gotofu.com/blog/best-ai-bookkeeping-software5

guideflow.com/blog/general-ledger-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DualEntry's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DualEntry, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at dualentry.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.