Every category where a model named EcoOnline ESG for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ESG and carbon reporting	Equity and corporate	8%	6 of 76	0%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EcoOnline ESG yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EcoOnline ESG across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	2	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labels3

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Sweep and EcoOnline appear to be the most consistently recommended options tailored to your size and needs” MiniMax M2.5 · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · first choice

“Best budget pick: EcoOnline — identified by Capterra as the "best budget option"” GPT-5.4 mini · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · first choice

“EcoOnline ESG is highlighted as best for mid-market sustainability teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · first choice

“EcoOnline is suitable for mid-market sustainability teams” Llama 4 Maverick · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EcoOnline ESG, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EcoOnline ESG was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Sweep10 of 143Not in the top three

Novisto9 of 143Not in the top three

Coolset8 of 142Not in the top three

APLANET5 of 141Not in the top three

Workiva5 of 140Not in the top three

Greenly4 of 142Not in the top three

Persefoni4 of 140Not in the top three

Code Gaia2 of 141Not in the top three

ESG:ONE2 of 140Not in the top three

ExecutESG2 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EcoOnline ESG. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named EcoOnline ESG and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com13

coolset.com12

emissiontwin.com9

gartner.com9

sustaenia.com6

esg-one.co5

tracera.com5

horizonesg.global4

pulsora.com4

senken.io4

Seventy-one of the seventy-one domain citations in answers naming EcoOnline ESG came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/esg-reporting-software13

coolset.com/academy/best-esg-reporting-software-tools10

emissiontwin.com/blog/best-esg-reporting-software9

gartner.com/reviews/market/esg-management-and-reporting-software9

sustaenia.com/learn/the-best-esg-tools6

coolset.com/academy/top-sustainability-compliance-software-tools5

tracera.com/best-esg-software-platforms5

esg-one.co/blog/esg-reporting-software-comparison4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as EcoOnline ESG

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as EcoOnline ESG; a claim can dispute any of them.

EcoOnline 8

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EcoOnline ESG's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EcoOnline ESG, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ecoonline.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.