Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Coolset · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Coolset

36Judge labels
4First choices
2Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in ESG and carbon reporting for mid-market buyers
Rank 5 of 76 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 19 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In esg and carbon reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Coolset for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
ESG and carbon reportingEquity and corporate8%5 of 760%19accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Coolset yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Coolset across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash11002
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast12104
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00202
MiniMax M2.511103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labels2
Comparative9 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained7 labels2
Negative2 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Coolset is frequently cited as the "go-to" for mid-market companies... Choose Coolset if you are in Europe and need strict regulatory compliance (CSRD)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Prioritize platforms suited for 500–5,000 employees, like Coolset, ESG:ONE, EcoOnline, or Novisto... Shortlist 3–5: Coolset (multi-framework, AI)” Grok 4.1 Fast · ESG and carbon reporting · scale prompt · first choice
“Sweep / Coolset / Plan A / ESG:ONE: These are specifically built for upper-mid-market companies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · scale prompt · first choice
“I'd suggest starting with Plan A or Coolset if you're in Europe and need CSRD compliance” MiniMax M2.5 · ESG and carbon reporting · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Coolset, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coolset was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Workiva21 of 364Not in the top three
Greenly20 of 368Not in the top three
Sweep20 of 366Not in the top three
Persefoni14 of 361Not in the top three
Novisto13 of 362Not in the top three
IBM Envizi9 of 360Not in the top three
Plan A8 of 362Not in the top three
EcoOnline ESG8 of 361Not in the top three
SAP Sustainability Control Tower8 of 360Not in the top three
Sustain.Life7 of 363Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Coolset. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 36 answers that named Coolset and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

coolset.comYour site25
guideflow.com22
gartner.com18
emissiontwin.com15
esg-one.co11
pulsora.com11
onestopesg.com10
tracera.com10
manglai.io9
sustaenia.com9

115 of the 140 domain citations in answers naming Coolset came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coolset's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coolset, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at coolset.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.