Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Novisto · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Novisto

57Judge labels
5First choices
10Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in ESG and carbon reporting for mid-market buyers
Rank 3 of 76 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
5 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 27 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In esg and carbon reporting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Novisto for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
ESG and carbon reportingEquity and corporate10%3 of 767%27accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Novisto yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Novisto across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00101
Perplexity Sonar11002
Grok 4.1 Fast03104
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash02013
Llama 4 Maverick10304
Qwen 3.7 Flash11002
Kimi K211002
GLM 4.7 FlashX11013
MiniMax M2.502103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels5
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative22 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labelsNone
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative57 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid‑market B2B companies, Novisto offers the best combination of multi‑framework support, audit readiness, and mid‑market pricing.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · first choice
“Novisto is designed for mid-market organizations and private-market firms that need a structured, professional ESG reporting platform” Llama 4 Maverick · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · first choice
“the best default choice is Novisto if your main goal is structured ESG reporting” Perplexity Sonar · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · first choice
“Novisto — Best Overall for Mid-Market ESG Reporting” Kimi K2 · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Beware the enterprise tools (Novisto, Sphera, Workiva's full suite) \u2014 these are custom-quoted” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · hard negative
“users have reported complex setup processes and difficulties with data imports” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ESG and carbon reporting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Novisto, over the 57 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Novisto was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Workiva47 of 5721Not in the top three
IBM Envizi34 of 571Not in the top three
Persefoni31 of 573Not in the top three
Watershed27 of 573Not in the top three
SAP Sustainability Control Tower27 of 570Not in the top three
Pulsora18 of 572Not in the top three
Diligent ESG15 of 570Not in the top three
Sphera15 of 570Not in the top three
Coolset13 of 573Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Novisto. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 55 of the 57 answers that named Novisto and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com47
coolset.com35
gartner.com35
pulsora.com26
esg-one.co25
onestopesg.com23
sopact.com17
sustaenia.com17
emissiontwin.com16
horizonesg.global14

255 of the 255 domain citations in answers naming Novisto came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Novisto's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Novisto, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at novisto.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.