Every category where a model named Emagia for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Cash application	Receivables and billing	0%	58 of 83	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by HighRadius at 16%
Accounts receivable automation	Receivables and billing	0%	31 of 77	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Books at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Emagia yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Emagia across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative12 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained8 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“or Emagia for strong support/integration” Grok 4.1 Fast · Accounts receivable auto · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“strong, but they are generally aimed at mid-market/enterprise use rather than tight-budget teams” GPT-5.4 mini · Cash application · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Emagia, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Emagia was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

HighRadius26 of 3111Not in the top three

Billtrust20 of 310Not in the top three

Versapay18 of 311Not in the top three

Esker18 of 310Not in the top three

Tesorio11 of 310Not in the top three

BlackLine Cash Application10 of 310Not in the top three

Sidetrade9 of 310Not in the top three

Serrala6 of 310Not in the top three

BILL5 of 311Not in the top three

Gaviti5 of 311Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Emagia. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 31 answers that named Emagia and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

emagia.comYour site21

highradius.com16

worldmetrics.org14

upflow.io12

rex.inc11

cashbook.com10

chaserhq.com10

transformance.ai10

bluecopa.com9

stuut.ai9

101 of the 122 domain citations in answers naming Emagia came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cashbook.com/best-cash-application-tools-2026-official-guide10

highradius.com/resources/Blog/best-cash-application-automation-tools10

upflow.io/software/best-cash-application-software10

emagia.com/blog/best-enterprise-cash-application-software9

rex.inc/resources/comparisons/best-cash-application-software9

worldmetrics.org/best/cash-application-software8

bluecopa.com/blog/cash-application-softwares7

emagia.com/blog/what-is-the-best-accounts-receivable-management-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Emagia

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Emagia; a claim can dispute any of them.

Emagia Cash Application 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Emagia's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Emagia, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at emagia.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.