Every category where a model named Enablon for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ESG and carbon reporting	Equity and corporate	0%	33 of 76	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Sweep at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Enablon yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Enablon across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Wolters Kluwer Enablon | Compliance depth | Mid-large | 7.70/10” Grok 4.1 Fast · ESG and carbon reporting · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Enablon, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Enablon was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workiva13 of 148Not in the top three

IBM Envizi8 of 142Not in the top three

Persefoni7 of 141Not in the top three

SAP Sustainability Control Tower7 of 140Not in the top three

Watershed7 of 140Not in the top three

Novisto6 of 140Not in the top three

Sphera6 of 140Not in the top three

Benchmark Gensuite4 of 140Not in the top three

Salesforce Net Zero Cloud4 of 140Not in the top three

Coolset3 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Enablon. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 14 answers that named Enablon and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com12

gartner.com9

horizonesg.global6

pulsora.com6

bigeasymagazine.com5

coolset.com5

esg-one.co4

linkedin.com4

sustaenia.com4

workiva.com4

Fifty-nine of the fifty-nine domain citations in answers naming Enablon came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/esg-reporting-software12

gartner.com/reviews/market/esg-management-and-reporting-software9

horizonesg.global/best-esg-reporting-software6

pulsora.com/blog/best-esg-reporting-software6

bigeasymagazine.com/2026/08/26/7-best-esg-reporting-and-disclosure-software-ranked-and-rev5

coolset.com/academy/best-esg-reporting-software-tools5

esg-one.co/blog/esg-reporting-software-comparison4

sustaenia.com/learn/the-best-esg-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Enablon

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Enablon; a claim can dispute any of them.

Wolters Kluwer Enablon 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Enablon's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Enablon, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at enablon.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.