Every category where a model named IBM Envizi for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ESG and carbon reporting	Equity and corporate	0%	25 of 76	36%	25	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for IBM Envizi yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated IBM Envizi across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	2	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	3	3
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	2
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	1	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	2	0	1	3
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative24 labelsNone

Budget-constrained17 labels3

Scale-constrained6 labels1

Negative15 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative76 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“(e.g., Workiva, Diligent, IBM Envizi) Generally trusted for their audit-ready workflows” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · negative prompt · alternative

“Choose IBM Envizi if: You need to manage thousands of sites and complex operational data points” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose IBM Envizi or Novisto if you need enterprise ESG data consolidation.” Perplexity Sonar · ESG and carbon reporting · comparative prompt · alternative

“a strong choice for mid-market to enterprise ESG data management and reporting” GPT-5.4 mini · ESG and carbon reporting · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Some consultants and industry observers recommend steering clear of ESG solutions from major tech firms” Mistral Small · ESG and carbon reporting · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid "Enterprise" platforms like IBM Envizi or Workiva, which typically start at $50,000+.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · hard negative

“Complex setup process - High costs - Some users report accuracy issues with large datasets” MiniMax M2.5 · ESG and carbon reporting · negative prompt · hard negative

“Over-Engineered "Legacy Giant" Pivots (The Implementation Trap)... Salesforce Net Zero Cloud, Microsoft Sustainability Manager, and IBM Envizi” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as IBM Envizi, over the 76 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and IBM Envizi was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Workiva64 of 7630Not in the top three

Persefoni41 of 765Not in the top three

Watershed39 of 765Not in the top three

Novisto34 of 760Not in the top three

Sweep27 of 762Not in the top three

SAP Sustainability Control Tower26 of 760Not in the top three

Diligent ESG24 of 761Not in the top three

Salesforce Net Zero Cloud22 of 760Not in the top three

Greenly21 of 765Not in the top three

Sphera21 of 760Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named IBM Envizi. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 68 of the 76 answers that named IBM Envizi and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com47

gartner.com41

coolset.com30

pulsora.com28

esg-one.co25

onestopesg.com21

sopact.com20

aibusinessgeek.com19

horizonesg.global16

bigeasymagazine.com15

262 of the 262 domain citations in answers naming IBM Envizi came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/esg-reporting-software46

gartner.com/reviews/market/esg-management-and-reporting-software40

coolset.com/academy/best-esg-reporting-software-tools30

pulsora.com/blog/best-esg-reporting-software27

esg-one.co/blog/esg-reporting-software-comparison21

sopact.com/use-case/esg-reporting-platforms20

aibusinessgeek.com/articles/ai-esg-reporting-software-202619

onestopesg.com/esg-resources/best-esg-reporting-software17

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as IBM Envizi

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as IBM Envizi; a claim can dispute any of them.

IBM Envizi ESG Suite 5IBM 3IBM Envizi Essentials 2Envizi 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when IBM Envizi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as IBM Envizi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ibm.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.