Finance AI Index
Index Vendors › Odoo · September 2026 Edition
5 categories · Ranked

Odoo

130Judge labels
27First choices
9Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
5Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
31% in ERP systems for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 70 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 30 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentA small-business product: leader at small business, not named at enterprise.
In erp systems · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Odoo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
ERP systemsAccounting and close19%2 of 7010%30accepted challenger
Supplier managementSpend and procurement4%7 of 800%3under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 26%
Accounting softwareAccounting and close0%13 of 560%5under 10 labels · led by Sage Intacct at 40%
Procure-to-paySpend and procurement0%21 of 850%4under 10 labels · led by Procurify at 45%
Financial consolidationAccounting and close0%55 of 960%2under 10 labels · led by Prophix at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Odoo yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Odoo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500303
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash01113
Perplexity Sonar11103
Grok 4.1 Fast31206
Mistral Small11204
DeepSeek V4 Flash12216
Llama 4 Maverick10102
Qwen 3.7 Flash10113
Kimi K211305
GLM 4.7 FlashX11204
MiniMax M2.511204

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels4
Paraphrase15 labels1
Comparative26 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained41 labels21
Scale-constrained7 labels1
Negative20 labels7not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative130 labels in all, every segment counted; 27 of the 38 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most small businesses with limited budgets, Odoo offers the best balance of affordability, features, and flexibility.” MiniMax M2.5 · ERP systems · budget prompt · first choice
“Start Here: Try oboloo or Odoo if you want zero cost and core supplier tracking/performance features.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Supplier management · budget prompt · first choice
“1. Odoo - a popular open-source ERP system that is highly customizable and has a wide range of features.” Llama 4 Maverick · ERP systems · budget prompt · first choice
“Odoo is praised for its balance of cost, flexibility, and scalability for growing businesses.” Mistral Small · ERP systems · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“they are "developer-first." If you do not have strong in-house developers... you will quickly build "customization debt"” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ERP systems · negative prompt · soft negative
“The caution is around over-customization and low-cost implementations” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ERP systems · negative prompt · soft negative
“The "App Store" License Trap... the license fees stack up rapidly” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ERP systems · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Odoo, over the 129 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Odoo was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
ERPNext57 of 1295Not in the top three
Acumatica54 of 1293Not in the top three
Sage Intacct53 of 1298Not in the top three
SAP Business One38 of 1290Not in the top three
Zoho One37 of 1291Not in the top three
SAP S/4HANA36 of 1292Not in the top three
QuickBooks26 of 1291Not in the top three
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP24 of 1292Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Odoo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 106 of the 129 answers that named Odoo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

erpresearch.com65
forbes.com53
dynamicssquare.com44
topdynamicspartners.com43
learn.g2.com33
softwareconnect.com33
g2.com23
cin7.com20
capterra.com18
erpfocus.com18

350 of the 350 domain citations in answers naming Odoo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Odoo

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Odoo; a claim can dispute any of them.
Odoo ERP 3Odoo (Community Edition) 2Odoo (Community) 1Odoo Community Edition 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Odoo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Odoo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at odoo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.