Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Exactera Tax Provision · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Exactera Tax Provision

12Judge labels

5First choices

1Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Exactera Tax Provision was named 6 times in Corporate tax provision, where Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision led with 26%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.

Small business9 of 101

under the label threshold

Mid-market6 of 98

under the label threshold

Enterprise43 of 71

under the label threshold

In corporate tax provision · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Exactera Tax Provision for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate tax provision	Tax and compliance	7%	6 of 98	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Exactera Tax Provision yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Exactera Tax Provision across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labels5

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Exactera Tax Provision appears to be one of the more accessible options in the market.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · first choice

“Exactera is the clear frontrunner for mid-sized companies.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · first choice

“Request demos from Exactera and TTI (Tax Series)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · first choice

“fastest path for teams with <20 entities still on Excel” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Corporate tax provision · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Exactera Tax Provision is likely *not* the budget pick because publicly listed pricing starts around $20,000/year” GPT-5.4 mini · Corporate tax provision · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Exactera Tax Provision, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Exactera Tax Provision was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bloomberg Tax Provision7 of 123Not in the top three

Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision6 of 121Not in the top three

CSC Corptax6 of 120Not in the top three

Longview Tax4 of 120Not in the top three

Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE4 of 120Not in the top three

TaxAct Business3 of 120Not in the top three

Oracle Tax Reporting2 of 120Not in the top three

Tax Series2 of 120Not in the top three

TurboTax Business2 of 120Not in the top three

Vena Solutions2 of 120Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Exactera Tax Provision. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 12 answers that named Exactera Tax Provision and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

capterra.com4

softwareadvice.com4

exactera.comYour site3

g2.com3

gitnux.org3

legalitcost.com3

wifitalents.com3

worldmetrics.org3

zipdo.co3

accounting.com2

Twenty-eight of the thirty-one domain citations in answers naming Exactera Tax Provision came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

capterra.com/p/10009412/Tax-Provision4

softwareadvice.com/product/512526-Tax-Provision4

worldmetrics.org/best/tax-provision-software3

zipdo.co/best/corporate-tax-provision-software3

accounting.com/resources/best-tax-software2

cnbc.com/select/best-tax-software-for-small-businesses2

ctacquisitions.com/best-tax-software-for-ma-20262

g2.com/categories/corporate-tax/small-business2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Exactera Tax Provision's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Exactera Tax Provision, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at exactera.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.