Every category where a model named Sovos Tax Provision for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Corporate tax provision	Tax and compliance	0%	19 of 98	0%	21	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sovos Tax Provision yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sovos Tax Provision across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	1	3
Mistral Small	0	2	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	4	0	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	3	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct17 labels2

Paraphrase4 labelsNone

Comparative18 labels5not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labels1

Scale-constrained11 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative61 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Multinational with many entities and jurisdictions; need repeatable ASC 740/IAS 12 workpapers and traceable variances | Sovos Tax Provision or ONESOURCE Tax Provision” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Corporate tax provision · comparative prompt · first choice

“Sovos Tax Provision (often ranked #1 overall; score ~9.0-9.4/10)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Corporate tax provision · comparative prompt · first choice

“Leading solutions include Bloomberg Tax Provision, Corptax, Longview, and Sovos Tax Provision” Mistral Small · Corporate tax provision · negative prompt · alternative

“Best for global tax teams needing repeatable ASC 740 and IAS 12 provision-close workpapers” Mistral Small · Corporate tax provision · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sovos Tax Provision, over the 61 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sovos Tax Provision was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Tax Provision40 of 6121Not in the top three

Bloomberg Tax Provision37 of 613Not in the top three

Longview Tax29 of 610Not in the top three

Workiva15 of 610Not in the top three

CSC Corptax13 of 610Not in the top three

Oracle Tax Reporting12 of 610Not in the top three

CCH Tagetik11 of 610Not in the top three

OneStream Tax Provision10 of 610Not in the top three

Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE9 of 611Not in the top three

Vertex Tax Accounting8 of 610Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sovos Tax Provision. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 61 of the 61 answers that named Sovos Tax Provision and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

worldmetrics.org56

zipdo.co47

gitnux.org46

wifitalents.com30

pro.bloombergtax.com29

tax.thomsonreuters.com28

cbh.com18

gartner.com17

rightworks.com17

houseblend.io14

302 of the 302 domain citations in answers naming Sovos Tax Provision came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

worldmetrics.org/best/tax-provision-software46

zipdo.co/best/corporate-tax-provision-software37

gitnux.org/best/tax-provisioning-software30

worldmetrics.org/best/corporate-tax-software30

worldmetrics.org/best/corporate-tax-provision-software26

wifitalents.com/best/tax-provision-software23

worldmetrics.org/best/corp-tax-software23

cbh.com/insights/articles/tax-provision-automation-guide-benefits-software-roadmap18

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Sovos Tax Provision

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sovos Tax Provision; a claim can dispute any of them.

Sovos 7

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sovos Tax Provision's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sovos Tax Provision, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sovos.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.