Every category where a model named ExecutESG for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
ESG and carbon reporting	Equity and corporate	6%	8 of 76	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Sweep at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for ExecutESG yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated ExecutESG across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained11 labels8

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative19 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Top Recommendation: ExecutESG ... this is currently the most cost-effective market leader.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · first choice

“Best Truly Free Software: ExecutESG ... is currently one of the best choices for SMEs” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · first choice

“ExecutESG (Best free starter option, especially for European SMEs)” Grok 4.1 Fast · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · first choice

“For absolute minimal budget: Start with ExecutESG (free tier) or OpenESG for basic compliance” Kimi K2 · ESG and carbon reporting · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ExecutESG, over the 19 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ExecutESG was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Greenly11 of 194Not in the top three

Workiva11 of 190Not in the top three

ESG Lift9 of 192Not in the top three

Sustain.Life9 of 192Not in the top three

IBM Envizi7 of 190Not in the top three

Persefoni7 of 190Not in the top three

Sweep6 of 192Not in the top three

Coolset4 of 193Not in the top three

Novisto4 of 190Not in the top three

SAP Sustainability Control Tower4 of 190Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ExecutESG. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 19 answers that named ExecutESG and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

executesg.comYour site16

g2.com13

gartner.com13

guideflow.com11

climefy.com10

esgsoftwareindex.com10

coolset.com9

esg-one.co7

wardn.com7

aibusinessgeek.com6

Eighty-six of the 102 domain citations in answers naming ExecutESG came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

executesg.com/resources/blog/esg-software-pricing-202613

gartner.com/reviews/market/esg-management-and-reporting-software13

g2.com/categories/environmental-social-and-governance-esg-reporting/small-business12

guideflow.com/blog/esg-reporting-software11

climefy.com/blog/top-5-esg-compliance-software10

coolset.com/academy/best-esg-reporting-software-tools9

esgsoftwareindex.com/choosing-esg-platform-pricing8

executesg.com/resources/blog/best-vsme-reporting-software8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ExecutESG's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ExecutESG, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at executesg.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.