Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › First Internet Bank · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

First Internet Bank

7Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. First Internet Bank was named 2 times in Business banking, where Mercury led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business22 of 64

under the label threshold

Mid-market24 of 78

under the label threshold

Enterprise39 of 99

under the label threshold

In business banking · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named First Internet Bank for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Business banking	Treasury and cash	0%	24 of 78	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Mercury at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for First Internet Bank yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated First Internet Bank across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“designed for businesses with higher transaction volumes and offers analyzed checking with detailed transaction reporting” Mistral Small · Business banking · direct prompt · alternative

“Choose a regional/commercial bank (like First Internet Bank or similar) if you need sophisticated treasury management” Kimi K2 · Business banking · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as First Internet Bank, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and First Internet Bank was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Axos Bank5 of 71Not in the top three

Mercury4 of 72Not in the top three

PNC Bank4 of 72Not in the top three

Chase Business Banking3 of 71Not in the top three

Wells Fargo2 of 71Not in the top three

Bank of America2 of 70Not in the top three

Bluevine2 of 70Not in the top three

Brex2 of 70Not in the top three

NBKC2 of 70Not in the top three

Novo2 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named First Internet Bank. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named First Internet Bank and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

forbes.com7

finder.com6

handelsblatt.com5

nerdwallet.com4

airwallex.com3

found.com3

money.co.uk3

rho.co3

amnistreasury.com2

brex.com2

Thirty-eight of the thirty-eight domain citations in answers naming First Internet Bank came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

forbes.com/financial-services/best-business-checking-accounts5

handelsblatt.com/geschaeftskonto/vergleich5

finder.com/business-banking4

forbes.com/advisor/banking/best-business-bank-accounts4

airwallex.com/en-us/blog/compare-business-bank-accounts3

forbes.com/advisor/banking/checking/best-business-checking-accounts3

rho.co/blog/best-online-business-bank-accounts3

amnistreasury.com/blog/business-account-comparison2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as First Internet Bank

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as First Internet Bank; a claim can dispute any of them.

First Internet Bank Commercial Analyzed Checking 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when First Internet Bank's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as First Internet Bank, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at firstinternetbank.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.