Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud · September 2026 Edition

FIS Integrity · 1 category · Named, not ranked

FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud

2Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

2 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud was named 1 time in Treasury management syst, where Trovata led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market80 of 124

under the label threshold

Enterprise43 of 88

under the label threshold

In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	0%	80 of 124	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Kyriba2 of 22Not in the top three

Modern Treasury2 of 20Not in the top three

SAP Treasury and Risk Management2 of 20Not in the top three

GTreasury1 of 20Not in the top three

HighRadius1 of 20Not in the top three

ION Treasury1 of 20Not in the top three

Ripple Treasury1 of 20Not in the top three

Trovata1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

debtbook.com2

eco.com2

gartner.com2

agicap.com1

articsledge.com1

bestfinancesites.com1

checkthat.ai1

cygnetise.com1

dilynx.com1

g2.com1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

debtbook.com/blog/best-treasury-management-systems2

eco.com/support/en/articles/16402412-best-treasury-management-software-20262

gartner.com/reviews/market/treasury-management-systems2

agicap.com/en/article/treasury-management-system1

articsledge.com/post/treasury-management-software1

bestfinancesites.com/treasury-management-systems1

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-treasury-management-software-tools1

cygnetise.com/blog/best-treasury-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud; a claim can dispute any of them.

FIS Integrity/Quantum 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FIS Integrity / Quantum Cloud, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fisglobal.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.