Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Modern Treasury · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Modern Treasury

17Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Modern Treasury was named 6 times in Treasury management syst and 1 other category, where Trovata led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business37 of 134

under the label threshold

Mid-market22 of 124

under the label threshold

Enterprise71 of 88

under the label threshold

In treasury management syst · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Modern Treasury for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Treasury management systems	Treasury and cash	0%	22 of 124	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Trovata at 18%
B2B payment acceptance	Receivables and billing	0%	66 of 91	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Helcim at 17%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Modern Treasury yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Modern Treasury across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	1	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative9 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Built for money movement and payment operations, rather than traditional corporate treasury.” Perplexity Sonar · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · alternative

“better if your main pain point is payment operations and API-driven money movement” GPT-5.4 mini · Treasury management syst · direct prompt · alternative

“For fintechs and marketplaces focused on payments: Modern Treasury.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Treasury management syst · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Not a front-end payment acceptance platform” GPT-5.4 mini · B2B payment acceptance · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Modern Treasury, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Modern Treasury was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Kyriba14 of 1710Not in the top three

GTreasury12 of 174Not in the top three

Trovata11 of 172Not in the top three

SAP Treasury and Risk Management11 of 170Not in the top three

ION Treasury8 of 170Not in the top three

HighRadius5 of 170Not in the top three

Agicap3 of 171Not in the top three

FIS Quantum3 of 170Not in the top three

Oracle Treasury3 of 170Not in the top three

Stripe2 of 171Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Modern Treasury. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Modern Treasury and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com12

eco.com11

treasury.ripple.com7

bestfinancesites.com6

debtbook.com6

worldmetrics.org6

checkthat.ai5

g2.com5

techvendorindex.com5

concourse.ai4

Sixty-seven of the sixty-seven domain citations in answers naming Modern Treasury came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

eco.com/support/en/articles/16402412-best-treasury-management-software-202611

gartner.com/reviews/market/treasury-management-systems9

treasury.ripple.com/posts/top-10-treasury-management-systems7

bestfinancesites.com/treasury-management-systems6

debtbook.com/blog/best-treasury-management-systems5

techvendorindex.com/software/treasury-management-systems5

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-treasury-management-software-tools4

concourse.ai/insights/best-treasury-management-software-20264

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Modern Treasury's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Modern Treasury, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at moderntreasury.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.