Finance AI Index

Index › Vendors › Fiverr Enterprise · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Fiverr Enterprise

14Judge labels

0First choices

8Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Fiverr Enterprise was named 6 times in Contractor payments, where Deel led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business68 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market24 of 83

under the label threshold

Enterprise72 of 76

under the label threshold

In contractor payments · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Fiverr Enterprise for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contractor payments	Spend and procurement	0%	24 of 83	17%	6	under 10 labels · led by Deel at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Fiverr Enterprise yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Fiverr Enterprise across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative8 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Fiverr Enterprise if you want a more freelancer management-oriented tool” Perplexity Sonar · Contractor payments · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Managing a private freelance marketplace | Fiverr Enterprise” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contractor payments · comparative prompt · alternative

“Another strong option is Fiverr Enterprise” Mistral Small · Contractor payments · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“High fee structures (Upwork: 10-20%; Fiverr: 20%)” Kimi K2 · Contractor payments · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fiverr Enterprise, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fiverr Enterprise was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wise Business11 of 142Not in the top three

Payoneer11 of 140Not in the top three

Deel10 of 144Not in the top three

Remote10 of 143Not in the top three

Papaya Global9 of 144Not in the top three

Upwork8 of 140Not in the top three

Gusto7 of 141Not in the top three

Rippling5 of 141Not in the top three

PayPal5 of 140Not in the top three

Tipalti5 of 140Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fiverr Enterprise. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 14 answers that named Fiverr Enterprise and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

contractor-of-record.com8

papayaglobal.com7

guideflow.com6

learn.g2.com6

remote.com6

g2.com4

reddit.com4

trustpilot.com4

bbb.org3

deel.com3

Fifty-one of the fifty-one domain citations in answers naming Fiverr Enterprise came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

contractor-of-record.com/software/contractor-payouts8

remote.com/blog/payroll/best-contractor-payment-tools6

guideflow.com/blog/contractor-payment-software5

learn.g2.com/best-contractor-payment-software5

mellow.io/news-and-articles/paying-international-contractors-securely-2026-best-platforms-3

papayaglobal.com/blog/10-best-contractor-payment-software3

papayaglobal.com/blog/avoiding-contractor-payment-fraud-in-enterprise-operations3

worksuite.com/resources/insights/best-contractor-payment-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Fiverr Enterprise

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Fiverr Enterprise; a claim can dispute any of them.

Fiverr 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fiverr Enterprise's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fiverr Enterprise, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fiverr.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.