Finance AI Index
Index › Vendors › FMIS Fixed Assets · September 2026 Edition
FMIS · 1 category · Named, not ranked

FMIS Fixed Assets

6Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
4 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. FMIS Fixed Assets was named 4 times in Fixed asset accounting, where Sage Fixed Assets led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market26 of 94
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise27 of 90
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In fixed asset accounting · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named FMIS Fixed Assets for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Fixed asset accountingAccounting and close0%26 of 940%4under 10 labels · led by Sage Fixed Assets at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for FMIS Fixed Assets yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated FMIS Fixed Assets across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“worth a look if you want configurable asset tracking with pricing marketed as accessible” GPT-5.4 mini · Fixed asset accounting · budget prompt · alternative
“a strong choice if you want a more finance-team-oriented tool with audit trail” GPT-5.4 mini · Fixed asset accounting · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as FMIS Fixed Assets, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FMIS Fixed Assets was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Sage Fixed Assets4 of 60Not in the top three
Fixed Asset Pro2 of 62Not in the top three
Asset Panda2 of 60Not in the top three
Bloomberg Tax Fixed Assets2 of 60Not in the top three
Thomson Reuters Fixed Assets CS2 of 60Not in the top three
SAP S/4HANA Cloud / SAP Finance1 of 61Not in the top three
AssetMAXX1 of 60Not in the top three
Bassets eDepreciation1 of 60Not in the top three
Bricks Fixed Assets1 of 60Not in the top three
EZOfficeInventory1 of 60Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FMIS Fixed Assets. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 6 answers that named FMIS Fixed Assets and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

assetcues.com2
capterra.com2
companyview.io2
softwareadvice.com2
softwareconnect.com2
acquisition-international.com1
g2.com1
getapp.com1
gitnux.org1
kingdee.com1

Fifteen of the fifteen domain citations in answers naming FMIS Fixed Assets came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

assetcues.com/blog/fixed-asset-accounting-software2
assetcues.com/blog/fixed-asset-tracking-software2
capterra.com/p/78913/Fixed-Asset-Pro2
companyview.io/software/fixed-asset-management2
softwareadvice.com/accounting/fixed-asset-accounting-software-comparison2
softwareconnect.com/roundups/best-fixed-asset-management-software2
acquisition-international.com/the-7-best-fixed-asset-depreciation-software-driving-finance1
capterra.com/fixed-asset-management-software/s/small-businesses1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as FMIS Fixed Assets

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as FMIS Fixed Assets; a claim can dispute any of them.
FMIS Fixed Asset Management 2FMIS 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FMIS Fixed Assets's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FMIS Fixed Assets, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fmis.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack